Judgment Criteria for Dogecoin in the Currency Circle and Summary of Practical Experience

After testing 50 native dogs, 35 failed and 15 succeeded. I studied dozens of native dogs, and then based on the experience of others, the summary is as follows:

Judgment criteria for native dog projects:

1. The more contract addresses the better, at least 3;

2. There is an official website, Twitter, Telegram, Facebook, white papers, code open source, and github code updates;

3. There are few airdrops, no pre-sales, private placements, and IDOs. Everyone is on the same starting line;

4.dextool score is higher than 95;

5. The pool is above 400,000U;

6. Most of the currency holding addresses are integers, which means that this project has SM, and there may be a market crash after it goes online;

7. LP must be locked. The longer the time, the larger the quantity, the better. Check at moonarch.app/;

8. The higher the community activity, the better. You can judge whether the community is a real person or a fake person, whether the speech is regular, and whether it is just cx for people to buy;

9. If the project party discloses the person in charge, check whether the person in charge's information is true. LinkedIn information can be faked to see if there is a lot of historical work experience and whether there are many interactions.

10. Don’t imagine that if you hold a local dog, it will increase hundreds or thousands of times in a few months or a year, and you will suddenly get rich. That kind of thing is hard to come by. 99% of them are leeks cutters. They will sell it after it rises several times. Don’t be greedy. , to find the next one.