The more opposing voices, the better!

Originally, I hadn't looked at the comments section for a long time, but I was worried that there might be omissions in the commission, so I just checked the comments section of the last two posts. There is one part that I find quite interesting.

In the post I made last week, the volume of opposition wasn't very large. I mentioned that we were on a 4-hour upward move, which would likely end around Monday, most probably near 100,000, before being pushed down. I even included a chart in the post (see Chart 2).

What I actually meant is that long positions need to be closed on Monday, and then a short position should be opened. If there is a short position, it should be held a bit longer, at least until around the 87,000 level.

Then, last night, I wrote an analysis, which essentially conveyed the same idea, right? I just added one more thing: it is also possible that this middle section won't continue its upward move but will go down directly. However, normally, it should make an upward move from the middle section. Placing short positions around 99,500 is relatively reasonable, and in terms of operations, one can split orders to short.

So, my two posts actually convey the same meaning, but the opposition was noticeably louder in last night's post, while the opposition was less in last week's post. This is quite interesting.