See original
Eric SJ
--
Some views on #Binance Alpha
1. In the past few issues, 38 projects have been launched, with BSC projects accounting for 36% of them, and the others primarily belonging to the current main ecosystems: Solana, Ethereum, and Base. Classified by track, Meme accounts for half of the listed targets.
It can be seen that the listing strategy not only provides certain support for BSC but also caters to the mainstream market by launching Meme projects.
Moreover, the launched Memes are basically not unknown targets, so before they go live, everyone generally has this expectation. I think this is also a reason why the listing effect has further diminished.
2. Therefore, from the perspective of the listing effect, Alpha's launch may be more favorable for infrastructure and other sectors. I reiterate a point I have mentioned repeatedly: a small market cap of 10-50 million + product = secondary Alpha.
Furthermore, many Memes already had quite high market caps before they went live, including some Solana Memes with market caps exceeding 300 million.
Profits often arise during periods of consensus divergence; those targets with certain products but lacking community heat may instead lead to better market performance.
3. With the continuous introduction of new projects, I believe the Alpha functional area may need more refined categorization. This innovative area does not have a rise and fall leaderboard like the main board.
It merely displays assets that can already be traded in wallets in a list. As this list continues to “add new entries,” it is not friendly to some of the first listed targets.
➠ Adopting more factors for subsequent categorization will also help users see more intuitive market performance (such as rise and fall leaderboards) when visiting this functional area.
This way, the community can more easily conduct long-term tracking of some targets that continue to perform well after launching in the Alpha area.
4. The most important thing is to provide more supplementary descriptions in the project descriptions, even aggregating third-party descriptions like CMC, rather than just a simple sentence.
➠ If necessary, the information sources from Binance Square can also be aggregated, as the square itself will encourage creators to produce content around this theme.
1. In the past few issues, 38 projects have been launched, with BSC projects accounting for 36% of them, and the others primarily belonging to the current main ecosystems: Solana, Ethereum, and Base. Classified by track, Meme accounts for half of the listed targets.
It can be seen that the listing strategy not only provides certain support for BSC but also caters to the mainstream market by launching Meme projects.
Moreover, the launched Memes are basically not unknown targets, so before they go live, everyone generally has this expectation. I think this is also a reason why the listing effect has further diminished.
2. Therefore, from the perspective of the listing effect, Alpha's launch may be more favorable for infrastructure and other sectors. I reiterate a point I have mentioned repeatedly: a small market cap of 10-50 million + product = secondary Alpha.
Furthermore, many Memes already had quite high market caps before they went live, including some Solana Memes with market caps exceeding 300 million.
Profits often arise during periods of consensus divergence; those targets with certain products but lacking community heat may instead lead to better market performance.
3. With the continuous introduction of new projects, I believe the Alpha functional area may need more refined categorization. This innovative area does not have a rise and fall leaderboard like the main board.
It merely displays assets that can already be traded in wallets in a list. As this list continues to “add new entries,” it is not friendly to some of the first listed targets.
➠ Adopting more factors for subsequent categorization will also help users see more intuitive market performance (such as rise and fall leaderboards) when visiting this functional area.
This way, the community can more easily conduct long-term tracking of some targets that continue to perform well after launching in the Alpha area.
4. The most important thing is to provide more supplementary descriptions in the project descriptions, even aggregating third-party descriptions like CMC, rather than just a simple sentence.
➠ If necessary, the information sources from Binance Square can also be aggregated, as the square itself will encourage creators to produce content around this theme.
Disclaimer: Includes third-party opinions. No financial advice. May include sponsored content. See T&Cs.
Replies 0