I saw an interesting viewpoint saying that Bitcoin has nothing to do with ordinary people. Only when you enter does it relate to you; if you do not enter, then it’s just an internal mutual loss, and the win or lose has nothing to do with you. Whether it rises to 1 million or 10 million dollars per coin has nothing to do with you because it’s just a zero-sum game casino.
Really? Whether it's Bitcoin, gold, or houses in major cities like Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, and Shenzhen, what is it essentially? It's participating in the process of wealth redistribution. If I buy something for 1 yuan, and you buy it for 1 million yuan, doesn’t that mean the fruits of your 10 years of labor belong to me? If you say you won’t buy, similarly, you can choose not to buy houses in major cities; you can choose not to buy anything. Then in what form is your asset stored? Cash? For the first 20 years, you hold cash while others buy houses. Tell me, has your labor really not been deprived? You are mistaken; when the gears of fate start turning, regardless of whether you actively participate, you will be swept into it.
The resources in this world are limited and will be distributed to specific people through various carriers and rules. For example, we work to create value for society, and in doing so, we participate in distribution. Those who create more value will cut a larger piece of the pie, while those who create less value, lying at home, can only be cut down. If you don’t consume and the amount of money you hold doesn’t change, will you not be cut? No, money is merely a way to calculate the proportion of social resources. If there is a total of 10,000 yuan, and you hold 1 yuan, you possess a 1/10,000 voucher for social resources. If the country finds it cannot produce your money, it simply opens a new venue to rob money there, the total amount can change to 100,000 or 1 million. It doesn't need to take your money; your money will naturally disappear—why? Because under the premise that social resources remain unchanged, you can only exchange for 1/100,000 or 1/1,000,000 of the resources.
So it's very simple. If more people want Bitcoin in the future, everyone will invest their hard-earned money into this pool to participate in the game of wealth redistribution. As everyone keeps pouring wealth into it, it necessarily draws wealth away from other pools. Can you understand this? For example, if the only pools in this world are the stock market and the cryptocurrency market, as everyone keeps investing their wealth shares and resource shares into the cryptocurrency market, the funds from the stock market are being drawn out. Wouldn't the price of every stock plummet? Those who chose the wrong pool, didn't their wealth get taken away? If you don’t play and just hold cash, you are essentially still passively playing, because in an ever-expanding large pool, if you don’t grab, you lose; if you don’t grab fast enough, you still lose.
You can choose not to buy Bitcoin, and you can choose not to buy anything else, but you must remember, cash is also an asset. Essentially, using cash to occupy a proportion of the wealth in society to participate in resource distribution is the same as participating with any other asset. What's the difference? Some assets will gather an increasingly large consensus, so the wealth of others will flow to you; while some assets will lose consensus, and your wealth will flow to others.
This game, whether anyone wants to participate or not, is a forced participation for everyone who is part of society. No one can escape it. Regardless of whether you actively participate or not, the game of wealth distribution has never stopped. Choosing the right asset vehicle is crucial to standing firm amidst the waves of wealth distribution.
#加密市场盘整 #市场调整後的机会？ #比特币市场波动观察 #美联储放鹰 $BTC