'Commercialization' and 'Chainification.'

Written by: Haotian

After reviewing the optimization points of the ELIZA V1 and V2 frameworks, I felt significant progress, especially in areas like unified Agent wallet management, unified message management, and enhanced scalability capabilities. However, to be honest, the current ELIZA framework is still at the optimization level of basic development architecture and has not significantly expanded the 'imagination space.' I personally look forward to its potential for 'commercialization' and 'chainification' in the future.

1) A complete set of Agent interoperability protocols, including basic message protocols for Agents (format standardization, routing mechanisms, state synchronization, etc.), dialogue interaction protocols for Agents (multi-Agent dialogue management, context information storage and state synchronization, etc.), Agent resource sharing mechanisms (computational, storage, etc. resource allocation), Agent task allocation mechanisms (intent understanding, task breakdown, progress synchronization, aggregation rules, etc.), and an identity and permission management layer for Agents (identity authentication, reputation scoring systems, permission management mechanisms, etc.);

2) A set of Tokenomics protocol, including governance token definitions (ai16z or ELIZA?), incentive mechanisms for Agent participants (incentives for Agent developers, data contribution incentives, computational resource supply rewards, verification node rewards, etc.), Gas economic systems (Agent invocation fees, Memory storage resource fees, cross-chain operation fees, deflationary burning rules, fee distribution mechanisms, etc.);

In addition to these two core essential components for 'chainification,' how to design a set of Agent asset circulation management standards similar to the ERC20 standard, incorporating a decentralized storage system, decentralized verification mechanisms (memory systems, behavior systems), and decentralized resource allocation and incentive mechanisms, etc., are all issues that ELIZA must consider for its long-term direction in 'chainification' reform.

Even if the goal of the ELIZA framework is not chainification, how to modularly integrate into the consensus layers of various chains, participate in governance, and collaborate in verification, etc., is also worth exploring.

Perhaps only with a clearly 'chainable' Roadmap can EliZA firmly establish itself as the leading EVM-level player in the AI Agent era. But opportunities and variables also arise in this process.

What will ai16z iterate step by step? Can a new framework like Arc catch up? Which framework will first have a clear path for chain-based advanced development? Who will first find a viable commercial closed-loop path out of the Virtual realm? These are all directions worth observing. Friends who are concerned about the subsequent evolution of AI Agent framework standards can communicate more.