🚨 Selling U, where is the "crime"?
Many cryptocurrency players still believe that virtual currency trading itself is not illegal, and that selling U to cash out and receiving illicit funds is not their fault; they think they can apply for unfreezing, and at most, their bank card will just be frozen. If it really comes to that, they can just return the fraudulently received funds to unfreeze their bank card, and they can extricate themselves. This is not the case, as according to Article 287, Paragraph 2 of the Criminal Law, as well as the judicial interpretation of the crime of aiding and abetting. It is presumed that you knowingly participated in transactions with others who are committing information network crimes through USDT, and you will be charged with aiding and abetting, with a maximum sentence of 3 years. According to Article 312 of the Criminal Law, as well as the judicial interpretation of the crime of concealing, it is presumed that you subjectively know that the funds involved are from fraud, which constitutes the crime of concealment, with a maximum sentence of 7 years.
Many people also believe that the investigative unit’s presumption of your subjective knowledge requires clear chat records between you and the scammer found on your phone, where the other party explicitly says, "I want to launder money, you sell U to me." This is not the case; in practice, it is based on the abnormal behaviors in your transactions that it is presumed you subjectively know the other party is committing information network crimes or that the source of the funds is from fraudulent activities.
The dean has long since laid the groundwork with Ethereum chain puppies, performing well with considerable profits; it feels like there is a lot of potential, and it might be the next Shiba.
