I don't understand why the atmosphere in the square is so hostile. Regarding this pnut, I've been saying from the 12th to the 15th that the main force is fleeing and building short positions; you can see this in the second image. Isn't that clear enough? Do I really need to tell you that you need to open short or long positions to understand? Is your comprehension ability really that poor? Even saying 'motionless' can get backlash. Haven't I made it clear that I've been bearish on pnut these past few days?

$PNUT Today, let's analyze from the data perspective why Pnut did not move much when Pica reached a new high from last night to today, and even fell when Pica was rising. In fact, this can be seen from the capital data. On the 12th, I saw that the main force was building short orders at a high position to remind everyone. From last night to today, when Pica pulled the market, the main force of Pnut basically only closed short orders and followed a little rise. Then, as soon as Pica pulled back, the main force began to close a large number of long orders and open short orders to smash the market, so I have never liked to do ambush orders for squirrels.

Don't buy the bottom of squirrel short-term contracts just because the price is low. At present, the main force is increasing short orders at this position. I don't feel the willingness to pull up. It may only follow Pica to pull up a little bit. Without strong news stimulation, it should not be able to pull up much. If you are optimistic about the long-term spot, you can ambush in batches. Personally, I will wait until the main force clearly has a large number of long orders to follow up on the right side in the short term. I don't want to enter the long-term spot for the time being. At least when the long-short ratio of the contract is normal, I will consider the long-term position.

Updated and added a third picture. On December 12, when everyone thought that Squirrel was making a strong comeback, I posted a message saying that the main force of Pnut was building short orders at high levels, reminding people of the risks and the movement of the main funds. I don’t understand what the people who are still criticizing in the comment section are thinking. Do you only like the kind of orders that teachers who lead orders ask you to open long and short positions? Don’t you understand what I said?