Someone asked about the concept of AI Agents.

The projects I've looked at are mostly concept coins, like last year's hot TAO, which is purely an air coin. There's nothing usable. Then there's Render, which is also misleading. These two projects are very similar to Elastic, which I invested in back in 2016, and later there was the domestic 'Malagobi'.

So, you see, speculating on AI is not something new; it's been around for a long time.

The earliest blockchain projects in non-financial directions were storage and computation. The Elastic I invested in at that time was for computation.

Now computation is also brushing against AI. So AO is also saying it's an AI concept.

Arweave is for storage, and AO is for computation.

In 2022, I talked about the relationship between storage and computation in the group. This is something I've pondered for decades before I figured it out.

The essence of computation is storage, which is why CPUs have registers. The so-called assembly language is just operations on registers.

But this statement is also incorrect.

Computation does not equal storage.

Computation is different from storage.

To be precise, computation is computation, and computation is the transformation of storage in a specific structure. Not gates, NAND gates, OR gates. In every computational device, it stores states, but through computation, this 'trigger' condition switches the state value of the storage.

What I'm discussing falls under computer science. Others may have written papers on this a hundred times already. I'm just reinventing the wheel, which is purely a waste of time. 'I have thought all day long; it is not as good as what I learn in a moment.'

So for most things, it's good to learn more; most have been researched thoroughly. You can just take a look, but you need to be able to analyze and discern for yourself.

Ultimately, it's still a matter of discernment.

As I often say, most people lack the ability to discern information.

The S-person game is simple, 12 players per round, 3 police, and 3 S-hands. If you can't even understand this simple game, don't even think about larger and more complex games.

Society is a game of 7 billion people, everyone is speaking out. There are not just police and S-hands, but also werewolves, prophets, fools, hunters, witches, doctors, snipers, pelicans, geese, ducks, pigeons, and an infinite number of roles.

Completely unrelated, talking past each other.

The world is a madman's dream, filled with nonsense and mumbling in dreams.

Some people say they want to get in to speculate.

Speculation is possible.

Prepare to lose money when speculating.

Refer to my speculation in the rune market last year. I originally invested 200U to buy ORDI and made 7000U, invested 150U to bet on SATS and made 4000U. It sounds pretty good, doesn't it? Like a comedy.

But it's not over yet; I also bet on DRAC, CULA, and a hodgepodge of others. Especially at the end of the market, I spent 1500U betting on StarkNet's stark and 2000U on ZKSync's sync.

In summary, it was just a lonely game.

There are also many articles discussing AI Agents in the market. If you're interested, take a look at them one by one, as many as you can. After reading, you'll have a feeling.

As for who is right or wrong, you need to discern and have your own opinion.

What?

If after reading, you feel confused and don't know who is right or wrong, then you might as well just play around. Just have a sense of it in your heart; knowing that you're just playing around is enough.

If I'm just randomly playing a game, I definitely won't be optimistic enough to think I'm going to win. I certainly expect the outcome to be random, with a higher probability of losing than winning. This is like guessing on a multiple-choice question in elementary school. If you don't know the answer and guess all C's, the probability of getting it wrong is greater than getting it right: the probability of being wrong is 75%, and the probability of being right is 25%, because there are 4 options.

The number of projects that go to zero far exceeds those that do not, so if you go in blindly guessing, the probability of losing money is much greater than making money.

I've said many times that investing is like throwing darts. The wall is big, and the target is small. To accurately throw the dart at the target, you need to open your eyes wide and practice for a long time to throw it very accurately. This is what the popular culture online refers to as the concept of 'entropy reduction.' Entropy means probability space; the huge wall is entropy. Reducing entropy means you strive to aim. The target is 'correct,' 'profitable,' 'winning.' To win, to be correct, to make money, you need to work very, very hard. If you throw with your eyes closed, the dart will definitely land outside the target. If you guess on a multiple-choice question with your eyes closed, you will surely choose the wrong answer. Since elementary school, most students just don't like to work hard; they prefer to study a little 'always choose C' lazy mysticism. In that case, you definitely won't score well.