The best way to determine whether a coin is genuine buying volume or a scheme controlled by a major player is to see which large holders are involved and to check the proportion of friends around you who understand and hold it. There are no coins in this world without major holders; the 80/20 principle is an objective law, even Bitcoin is no exception.

Why do some coins seem very lively, but their trading volume just can't rise and be sustained? Because of the so-called volume manipulation costs; long-term high control can't sustain this manipulation.

Some non-consensus fast tokens can increase to tens of millions in just a few days, usually with over 90% control. How do I know? Because with Cheems, just among my friends, there were calls for buying in the range of ten to twenty million USD, while the market cap was only about seventy million. This was still the result of many people trusting me, cherishing their reputations, and treating Twitter like a friend circle, shouting loudly every day. For other similar market cap scheme coins, which major holders and KOLs are you seeing involved and shouting desperately? Give up the illusion that a memecoin without major holders can have a high ceiling without cutting you, because it must be that one side holds a large number of chips to maintain it.

Don't believe in coins without history, don't believe in coins with low trading volume and manipulation costs, or be prepared to either ride the wave or get harvested.