The distribution of the $MAJOR airdrop has raised confusion and dissatisfaction within the user community due to unevenness and lack of transparency. Below are the main issues:
1. Uneven Distribution
• Some users who are not active frequently receive more tokens, even in cases where they completed more tasks but received significantly fewer tokens. This causes frustration in the community due to unclear distribution criteria.
• Complete the same tasks but receive a confusingly different amount of tokens.
2. Lack of Transparency
• There are no criteria or formulas made public to explain how tokens are allocated.
• With over 35 million active users, even though only about 5 million participate regularly, the average distribution should be around 10-20 tokens/wallet. However, the reality does not reflect this, with some regular users receiving less than 1 token.
3. Impact on the Community
The unfairness in distribution causes the community to lose trust. Unfair distribution not only causes controversy but also affects the project's image.
Necessary Solutions
To address concerns and regain trust, the project needs to:
• Publicly disclose the criteria for token distribution to ensure transparency.
• Consider and fairly compensate affected users.
• Commitment to fair practices in future airdrops.
• Minimum allocation (e.g., 20-30 tokens) to ensure all users benefit fairly.
Conclusion
The success of a crypto project depends on fairness and community trust. Addressing this controversy is essential to ensure sustainable development.
