What if $BTC is the greatest deception of all time?

Are we truly expected to believe that influential figures such as Binance's Changpeng Zhao (CZ), former U.S. President Donald Trump, Coinbase's Brian Armstrong, MicroStrategy's Michael Saylor, or Ethereum's creator Vitalik Buterin are completely unaware of Bitcoin’s origin? Is it plausible that none of these individuals have knowledge of its creator?

The mystery surrounding Satoshi Nakamoto, the pseudonymous creator of Bitcoin, remains one of the greatest enigmas in modern technology and finance. Despite the immense impact Bitcoin has had, it is astonishing that the identity of its creator has eluded confirmation for over a decade. Could it be possible that influential industry leaders, deeply entrenched in the cryptocurrency ecosystem, truly have no insight into this monumental question?

Consider Michael Saylor, a vocal advocate and significant investor in Bitcoin, who frequently promotes its benefits across various platforms. One might ask: what does he gain from his unwavering support? Is it conceivable that he, a man so invested in Bitcoin, genuinely has no clue about the identity of its creator?

When Nakamoto was developing Bitcoin, it seems improbable that the project was entirely solitary, devoid of any discussions with trusted confidants. The collaborative nature of technological innovation often involves at least some degree of consultation or peer review.

We strongly assert that the creator of Bitcoin is not as anonymous as commonly portrayed but known to a select, privileged few. It is not unfathomable to speculate that one or more individuals mentioned earlier are privy to this truth, yet choose to keep it hidden. Could the shroud of anonymity serve a greater purpose—perhaps to maintain Bitcoin’s decentralized ethos or to shield its creator(s) from scrutiny?

This enduring mystery fuels speculation, skepticism, and conspiracy theories alike, leaving the world to wonder whether the true identity of Satoshi Nakamoto will ever be revealed.