🧬 $BTC BTC here is the confirmation of the words from my last analysis. Now in the mass of "legitimate analysts" from santiment, coinglass, crypto-quant, etc., they are muttering about the absence of FOMO, low financing rates, and a minimal number of open short positions. But if retail is not shorting, it does not mean that there are no sellers at all; the 95k-96k zone still acts as a resistance block from the previous review, but buyers in this case have a significant weight, 90k-80k quantitative platform of limit walls, so I see no reasonable basis for the price to just fly to grab this liquidity, who benefits from this in such a situation, when everyone is reading how Trump appoints all apologists and proponents of cryptocurrencies like Howard Lutnick to his administration…

🧬$BTC $ETH formed a flat movement, which was predictively stated in the last review/analytics, liquidations accumulated on both sides validate this sideways movement. The chart $BTC itself confirms the local S/P balance and the bifurcation point, volumes in the flat are reduced, which indicates that a large player is gaining a position, but where is the big guy gaining, buying or selling? Here you need to look at the footprint (clusters). 91100-93100 is the area of ​​​​the first echelon of sellers, in case of a breakthrough of these blocks, significant fences for new peaks are not worth it.

On the other side, buyers have placed their blocks, which are set at 89k and are spread out in a wide pool up to 80k, which may indicate the desire of large speculators to unload at higher prices. I think that going below 84k (not counting a false breakout) is very undesirable for the continuation of the "fever", because in this case the current range will break, and storming 100k below this range will be more difficult and long participants will temporarily lose this prerogative, so you need to go and set new ATHs from this sideways and without corrections.