Some argue that Bitcoin may never surpass the $100K mark, suggesting it serves as the ultimate "retail trap." However, this perspective raises questions: how can retail investors be "trapped" if the majority remain unaware or uninvolved in the crypto space?
If the objective were truly to draw in mass participation, wouldn't it be more effective for Bitcoin to soar well beyond $100K, capturing widespread attention before any significant pullbacks occur?
To be clear, this isn't a call for Bitcoin to hit $300K during this cycle that leans into overly optimistic speculation. However, the idea of a macro top below $100K seems inconsistent with broader market dynamics.
What are your thoughts? Could there be a critical piece of the puzzle being overlooked?
