Home
Notification
Profile
Trending Articles
News
Bookmarked and Liked
Creator Center
Settings
See original
nicky0x
--
Bullish
Follow
If you missed DOGE
Or you missed PEPE
Then don't miss
$JASMY
Disclaimer: Includes third-party opinions. No financial advice. May include sponsored content.
See T&Cs.
437
0
Replies
0
Quote
3
Explore the latest crypto news
⚡️ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto
💬 Interact with your favorite creators
👍 Enjoy content that interests you
Email / Phone number
Sign Up
Login
Relevant Creator
nicky0x
@nicky0x
Follow
Explore More From Creator
Most platforms would ensure that transactions with severe slippage or insufficient liquidity simply do not go through, protecting users from catastrophic losses. Cetus, on the other hand, seems to leave users to fend for themselves. In decentralized finance (DeFi), transparency and user protection should be top priorities. A simple warning message could have prevented my loss. Instead, Cetus failed to meet even the most basic standards of user safety and responsibility. When a user loses their tokens due to the platform's lack of proper risk management, who takes responsibility? Cetus claims to offer reliable trading tools, yet basic protections are missing. Users are expected to enable modes like aggregator mode on their own without clear instructions or warnings. The support team’s response felt dismissive and failed to acknowledge the platform’s serious flaws. A Warning to Other Traders I write this as a cautionary tale to anyone considering trading on Cetus. Be extremely careful, and do not assume the platform will protect you or issue warnings about potential risks. If you are not already familiar with advanced DeFi tools, Cetus may leave you exposed to unnecessary and devastating losses. Final Thoughts Cetus’s failure to implement proper risk warnings and its casual approach to user safety are unacceptable. A responsible platform should prioritize transparency, user education, and safeguards to ensure users do not lose their funds due to preventable issues. I hope this serves as both a wake-up call for Cetus and a warning for other traders. Without significant improvements, this platform risks losing the trust of its users. To the Cetus team: I urge you to address this issue immediately. Implement proper warnings, enable protective features by default, and take responsibility for user safety. Until then, I cannot recommend this platform to anyone. $CETUS just a shit
--
A Frustrating and Costly Experience on the Cetus Trading Platform Recently, I had an incredibly disappointing experience while using the Cetus trading platform, which resulted in the near-total loss of my SUI tokens. What frustrates me the most is not just the loss itself, but the glaring lack of risk warnings and the apparent irresponsibility from the Cetus team. Let me share the details of this unfortunate incident and my thoughts on the platform's serious shortcomings. The Transaction That Cost Me Everything I executed a transaction on Cetus with the expectation of a smooth and transparent process. To my dismay, the amount of tokens I received was significantly lower than the SUI tokens I spent. During the entire process, I did not receive any warnings about potential issues such as low liquidity or high slippage. For reference, here is the Transaction ID: TX ID: 9fWtSMDWQoJj4xKzk91sRFVJToV144zoXPqhrzrLYX2e This left me in shock. How could such a critical risk go unflagged on a platform that claims to cater to traders? No Warnings, No Protection for Users In most other decentralized platforms I’ve used—such as FlowX and Turbo Finance—I always receive clear warnings when executing transactions in conditions of low liquidity or high slippage. These warnings are crucial because they help users avoid significant losses. However, on Cetus, I was met with absolute silence. There was no alert, no risk notification—nothing. I almost lost all my SUI tokens in this transaction, and it seems the platform did nothing to prevent it. When I reached out to the Cetus support team, their response only added to my frustration. I was told that I should "enable aggregator mode" to fetch liquidity from other sources. But this raises serious questions: Why does the platform not issue risk warnings for low liquidity transactions? Why is such a critical feature like aggregator mode not enabled by default or clearly communicated to users? $CETUS just a shit
--
Với $TIA giá này vẫn mua tốt thôi, thậm chí rẻ là khác, mùa bull nếu trả giá quá nhiều sẽ lỡ mất cơ hội, cách đơn giản là DCA, mua ở nhiều mức giá, và lúc bán cũng vậy !
--
LFG !!! $JASMY Mùa này chỉ việc chọn điểm đẹp, mua, và đi chơi. Đơn giản đúng không ae! Năm nay mình vẫn chưa chốt lời con nào, chỉ mua thêm !
--
Thử mua một ít con bò cho chuyến tàu nhanh hôm nay $COW
--
Latest News
ESMA Seeks Feedback on Crypto Asset Service Guidelines
--
Bitcoin's Bull Market Expected To Continue Amid Institutional Investments
--
Hong Kong Court Issues Tokenised Injunction Order Using Blockchain
--
Hong Kong Securities Regulator to Announce Virtual Asset Development Roadmap
--
Ethereum Client Geth Releases Critical Update to Fix Mainnet Block Creation Issue
--
View More
Trending Articles
ADA Approval: Prices Soar As the Rumor of Approval Surrounds the Token
Coinfomania
Why Is Solana (SOL) Suddenly Dumping? FTX Repayment Plan Sends Shockwaves 🚨*
jk India
[https://www.binance.info/activity/calendar/200PEPE?ref=GRO_
Erfan sheik
Lessons from 8 Years in the Crypto Market Over the past eig
IsK Crypto
$XRP Analyst Predicts XRP Price Can Reach $250 Amid Ripple W
User- El145
View More
Sitemap
Cookie Preferences
Platform T&Cs
