The secret war has begun, the Fed cuts interest rates, Musk withdraws investment, and China makes a big move. Who will play the next big game?

On November 7, 2024, the Federal Reserve announced another interest rate cut, with the interest rate falling to between 4.5% and 4.75%. As soon as the news came out, it immediately set off a huge wave in the global financial market. On the surface, this was to balance employment and inflation, but in fact it seemed like a carefully planned economic strategy. While the world was paying attention to this move, Musk suddenly asked Taiwanese suppliers of his companies to relocate, and China launched a 10 trillion economic policy in a timely manner.

Behind this global economic game is a war without gunpowder. As the global financial hegemon, the United States has been playing the trick of "raising interest rates and lowering interest rates" for decades. When they raise interest rates, global funds flock to the United States like being attracted by a magnet; when they lower interest rates, they take the opportunity to buy depreciated assets in other countries at low prices. This means of economic hegemony has caused heavy losses to many countries. But today's world pattern has changed dramatically, and countries are no longer objects of slaughter.

$BTC #新币挖矿&盘前交易USUAL #新币挖矿你参加了吗？

Looking back at the origin of this economic game, the Fed's move to cut interest rates twice in just two months is particularly eye-catching. There is a deep strategic intention behind this decision. The Fed previously attracted a large amount of global funds to the United States through continuous interest rate hikes, causing asset prices in other countries to fall sharply. Now it suddenly turns to cutting interest rates. On the surface, it is said to be to regulate the economy, but in reality it seems to be looking for opportunities to prepare to acquire high-quality assets in other countries at low prices.

This approach is like a businessman who first raises prices to force others to sell, and then takes the opportunity to buy when they are desperate. This interest rate cut also coincides with the strategic layout of the return of American manufacturing. They hope to attract more companies to return to the United States by reducing financing costs. Behind this economic means is the ambition of the United States to reshape the global industrial chain.

At the same time as the Federal Reserve cut interest rates, Musk suddenly asked Taiwanese suppliers of his companies to move their factories out. The timing of this decision was quite delicate, and the outside world speculated whether it was related to the strategic intentions of the United States. Musk himself remained silent on this, but the impact of this decision continued to ferment. Suppliers faced huge relocation costs and operational risks, and the entire industry chain could be impacted as a result.

This reorganization of the supply chain will not only affect the production costs of enterprises, but also the development direction of related industries. The previously smoothly operating industrial chain may be broken, affecting the layout of the global manufacturing industry. Is this change due to pure commercial considerations or is it a move to cooperate with the US strategy? The answer seems to be self-evident.

Facing the US economic siege, China decisively launched a 10 trillion yuan economic policy. This unprecedented move immediately changed the entire economic game. China made a beautiful move, which not only stabilized market confidence, but also effectively curbed the speculative behavior of external capital. It was like telling the world: China is no longer a market that can be slaughtered at will.

The 10 trillion yuan of capital injection covers multiple fields from high-tech to traditional manufacturing. It can not only boost the economy, but also help companies survive the pain of transformation. The United States originally hoped to influence the Chinese economy through interest rate cuts and supply chain adjustments, but China's move actually resolved this attempt. In this economic game, China has demonstrated strong resistance and strategic determination.

This large-scale adjustment of economic policies demonstrates China's determination to maintain economic security. It can not only stabilize the domestic market, but also inject new impetus into global economic development. This proactive attitude makes it difficult for the United States to implement its economic strategy. In this war without gunpowder, China is proving its economic strength with practical actions.

At present, this economic game is still ongoing. The Fed's interest rate cut policy did affect the global capital flow in the short term, but the effect was not as expected. China's timely economic policies played a strong defensive role, not only stabilizing the domestic market, but also attracting a large amount of international investment. As for Musk's plan to adjust the supply chain, due to practical problems such as cost and technical barriers, the progress is not smooth. Many Taiwanese suppliers said that it is neither realistic nor economical to completely transfer the production line in the short term. The results of this economic game prove that any unilateral economic hegemony is difficult to work.

Qingshan Changzai: The Fed’s tactic of cutting interest rates is still the same old trick, but this time it hit a wall.

Mingyue Qingfeng: Does Musk want to follow the US government? Unfortunately, the reality is cruel. The supply chain cannot be moved just like that.

Chunhua Qiushi: China reacted quickly this time, and the 10 trillion dollar move directly disrupted the United States' wishful thinking.

Distant mountains are covered with fog: Economic warfare is more dangerous than real guns and live bullets, but China is no longer what it used to be.

Moxiang Scholar: America’s economic hegemony is doomed to fail. The world has changed.

Zhuyinghengxie: It is not easy to transfer the supply chain, and many companies have to consider the actual costs.

Haitianyisese: China's economic policies come at a timely moment, which is the real preparation for a rainy day.

Watching this global economic game, one can't help but ponder: Can economic hegemony really dominate the world pattern? In the past few decades, the United States has indeed gained huge benefits through financial means. But now the world has undergone earth-shaking changes, and countries are constantly strengthening their economic defense capabilities. Do the Fed's interest rate cuts and Musk's supply chain adjustments, these seemingly strong moves, reflect their anxiety about the new situation? And what kind of changes will China's strong response bring to the global economic pattern?