Yes, that's right. San Ma Ge's strategy and operation method is basically a dual-direction operation, but not with the same coin. For example, when making a short at the peak of the wave, it is BTC, and when making a long at the low point of the wave, it is ETH. This is basically how it operates. In the end, both are looking for balance using the accumulation point and extreme points, ultimately earning from both sides or having one break-even while the other takes profit.

For example, this is the current practical case. You shorted BTC at 73500 and set a break-even loss, so this trade is already at 0 risk. Didn't I just mention the support at 72000? You took profit on 50% of your position at the support level, so it’s just a matter of making more or less profit, which doesn’t need to be worried about.

Then the long position in ETH is not only not losing but is also slightly profitable. The cost of the accumulation point has decreased, and the position is also reasonable. I don’t want to wait until the extreme point of 2578-2535; I want it to rise to my expected target. ETH has heavy pressure, and the ultra-short line of 2650 (the take profit point from yesterday's strategy) has again become a pressure point.

Because I have high requirements for entry points and position cost control, achieving unity of knowledge and action is the only way to profit and exit. #BTC