đ Move-Based Blockchains: Aptos, Sui, and Movement Compared
Move-based blockchains are becoming increasingly popular in the crypto world. Aptos, Sui, and the upcoming Movement blockchain have captured the interest of both developers and investors. While all three chains utilize the Move programming language, their designs have key differences that affect their performance, consensus mechanisms, and transaction speeds.
MOVE Chains are on the rise. #Aptosï»ż and #SuiNetwork are rapidly gaining mindshare and the upcoming @movementlabsxyz is seeing significant growth on testnet. All three chains utilise the Move language, but what really separates them under the hood?
đž Blockchain Architectures and Consensus Mechanisms
Aptos and Movement use linear chain architectures, while Sui uses a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) structure. Aptos relies on its own AptosBFT (Byzantine Fault Tolerance) consensus mechanism to ensure secure and fast transactions. Sui uses the Mysticeti consensus, which is built on DAG-based BFT and allows for even faster transaction processing. Movement uses Avalancheâs Snowman consensus, known for its efficiency in decentralized networks.
Aptos has a Time to Finality (TTF) of about 0.9 seconds. Sui takes the lead with around 0.5 seconds, while Movement has a slightly longer finality time of about 1 second. These speeds show how quickly each chain confirms transactions.
Aptos and Movement both use Block-STM parallel execution for transaction processing, allowing them to handle many transactions at the same time. Sui, however, uses a State Access Parallelisation technique, which focuses on making state access more efficient.
The theoretical transactions per second (TPS) vary across the three blockchains. Sui boasts the highest, with a TPS of 297,000. Aptos and Movement both achieve around 160,000 TPS. These impressive speeds show their potential for handling large-scale applications and user bases.
