At the recent Bitcoin Amsterdam conference, a panel discussion highlighted the issue of flawed research being used to drive harmful policies around Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies.


The panel, titled "Flawed Research Drives Harmful Bitcoin Policies," brought together experts who criticized the quality and objectivity of much of the academic research being conducted on Bitcoin and its environmental impact.


One of the panelists, Dr. Hass McCook, a civil engineer and Bitcoin researcher, argued that much of the existing research on Bitcoin's energy consumption and carbon footprint is deeply flawed. He stated that these studies often rely on outdated or inaccurate data, make unsupported assumptions, and fail to properly account for the nuances of Bitcoin's decentralized network.


"The research that's being done on Bitcoin's energy consumption and environmental impact is often sloppy, biased, and driven by pre-determined conclusions," McCook said. "This flawed research is then used by policymakers to justify harmful regulations and restrictions on Bitcoin."


Beyond Resistance Money panel discussion.

Another panelist, Dr. Saifedean Ammous, author of "The Bitcoin Standard," echoed these concerns, stating that the academic community has been "captured" by those with a vested interest in undermining Bitcoin. He argued that many researchers are influenced by funding sources or ideological biases, leading to skewed and misleading findings.


The panel also discussed the real-world consequences of these flawed studies, such as the recent crackdown on Bitcoin mining in China and the growing pressure on financial institutions to limit their exposure to cryptocurrencies.


"When policymakers base their decisions on faulty research, it can have devastating impacts on the Bitcoin ecosystem and the broader crypto industry," said McCook. "We need to demand higher standards of academic rigor and objectivity when it comes to studying Bitcoin and its environmental impact."


The panel's discussion highlighted the urgent need for more transparent, well-researched, and unbiased studies on Bitcoin's energy consumption and sustainability. Experts argue that this is crucial to ensure that policies and regulations around cryptocurrencies are based on sound, evidence-based analysis rather than flawed or biased research.

$BTC #BTC60KResistance