The US election may end early for several reasons.

1. The main candidates have obvious advantages. One candidate may have far more public support and campaign resources than other opponents, making the election results gradually clear and losing suspense in advance. For example, Trump's influence is so huge that other candidates cannot compete.

2. External pressure. Changes in the international situation or the occurrence of major events require the United States to determine the leader as soon as possible to deal with the crisis, thus prompting the election to speed up the process. For example, sudden international conflicts require strong leadership decisions.

3. Sudden changes in the economic situation. If the U.S. economy encounters a major crisis or turnaround, voters may quickly lean toward candidates with better economic governance capabilities, speeding up the determination of election results.

4. A high degree of unity within the party. A political party has strong support for a particular candidate and is united in its external relations, which rapidly expands the candidate's advantage.

5. Social opinion is one-sided. The media and public opinion strongly favor one candidate, which influences voters' judgment and accelerates the election process.

6. Major policy promises attract attention. Candidates put forward major policy proposals that are very attractive and win broad support.

7. Competitor Mistakes. Other candidates made major mistakes, causing their support to drop sharply.

8. Public health emergencies. Decisive leadership is needed to respond and prompt election results.

9. Impact of technological development. New technological means change the way of campaigning and accelerate the victory of advantageous candidates.

10. Natural disasters. When faced with major natural disasters, voters expect capable leaders to emerge as soon as possible.

11. Diplomatic crisis is urgent. Urgent diplomatic situations require rapid identification of leaders to handle them.

12. The candidate has outstanding personal charm. He or she can attract a large number of voters with his or her unique personality charm and quickly establish victory.

13. There is a huge disparity in campaign funding. Candidates with sufficient funds can conduct more extensive campaigns and secure victory in advance.

14. Strong support from specific interest groups. Driven by these groups, the candidates have a clear advantage.

15. Historical trend influence. Candidates who are in line with current historical development trends are more likely to win quickly.

​Personal opinion: The US election has always been the focus of global attention, and its results have a significant impact on the United States and the world. If the election ends early, it may bring about a series of changes. On the one hand, quickly determining the leader can improve decision-making efficiency to a certain extent, especially in the face of major crises. But on the other hand, it may also cause controversy because the process is too hasty. We should look at the US election with an objective attitude, and at the same time hope that the US political system can continue to improve and elect leaders who truly seek the welfare of the people and contribute to world peace and development. In the core socialist values, we advocate the concepts of democracy, justice, harmony, etc., and hope that the political systems of all countries can develop in a more fair and reasonable direction, creating a good political environment for the common progress of mankind.