The recurring tensions between Israel and the nations of the Middle East are merely the visible surface of a much more complex geopolitical dynamic.
What we are witnessing today is the continuation of a regional strategy where the economy of war, fueled by geopolitical ambitions, clashes with the aspirations of peoples oppressed for decades seeking emancipation.
Israel, bolstered by its historic support from the United States and its technological and military prowess, has established itself as a key player in the Middle East.
However, this position of "supremacy" is not eternal. It is only a temporary illusion in a region where alliances constantly evolve, and every actor plays multiple sides at once.
Algeria, a country with a long tradition of resistance, presents itself today as a defender of Arab and Muslim causes, particularly that of Palestine.
The rise of belligerent rhetoric from its president fits within this dynamic. But the real question is whether Algeria is prepared to face the consequences of such a direct confrontation with Israel, especially in a context where Turkey, a key NATO member, might also decide to get involved.
The crucial element here is the ambiguous stance of Saudi Arabia. This country, long perceived as a stronghold of support for the Palestinian cause, now seems to be withdrawing. Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MBS) has chosen a more pragmatic approach, focusing on domestic reforms and the economic challenges facing his country.
His apparent disinterest in Palestine is not incidental: it reflects a strategic redefinition of Saudi priorities, dictated by the need to prepare for a post-oil world, where regional influence will be shaped as much by economic power as by military strength.
Thus, the potential entry of Algeria or Turkey into the conflict could mark a turning point.
Not only because Turkey, with its second-largest NATO army, represents a significant military force, but also because it would compel many countries to take a stand in a conflict that risks redrawing the political landscape of the Middle East.
From a market perspective, such an escalation would inevitably have repercussions. We are already in a period of high volatility where economic and technical fundamentals suggest a bullish market for digital assets, particularly Bitcoin.
However, a war, especially one involving regional powers of this magnitude, could quickly reverse the trend, at least in the short term.
Nonetheless, the fundamental question is whether these events should truly cause concern.
Geopolitics often impacts markets unpredictably, but that does not mean we should panic. Smart investors know to look beyond immediate fluctuations and seize the opportunities that volatility presents. As always, staying informed, understanding the underlying dynamics, and adapting accordingly is essential.
