The bull market cannot be judged by simple cycles in the past, but rather——
Are there any new ways of playing that can support more capital participation?
Is there a new model that can reduce negative-sum games and enable the industry to further develop?
A bull market without wealth-creating effect and bumper harvest is a fake bull market.
Why do people like memes that have a strong consensus basis?
Take Pepe as an example. Although he is now covered with a meme shell, his line is more stable than the so-called value coins and institutional coins. He is more resistant to declines. Long-term key position protection is like a principle, making people believe that "he will not do that kind of thing". The rise and rebound will be more violent, making people look forward to his exceeding expectations again. A good coin will become a real pua artist from the K-line, making your entire experience of getting along with others better than that of competitors and other people, rather than all kinds of mouth cannons that even induce users to ultimately hurt themselves, which tarnishes the concept of pua.
The core of the cryptocurrency world is "small bets for big gains". Meme was originally the ticket that carried this concept the most. The high-market-value memes represented by Pepe competed secretly and gradually carried the consensus of big funds. The mysterious team became more attractive at this time.
Even those with small funds know how to play on-chain memes to find high-odds opportunities.
The middle class, with limited access to information, suffers the most.
In fact, there are always assets that rebound violently from low levels, and then fall rapidly after the rebound. No big funds will like those with fancy negative declines and PUA, which is a vicious cycle.
This routine appears repeatedly in the cryptocurrency circle, and it can indeed be used to reap profits. But in fact, even if the harvesting structure is written out and shown to the financiers, only small financiers and those who are really short of money will do such a shameful thing. You can't even hold your head up when chatting with your wealthy friends, because you have no money to show off.
Just like dealing with people, many coins are beautiful on the outside but rotten on the inside.
The packaging looks glorious on the surface, with luxurious academic qualifications and a luxurious investment lineup. However, the actual academic qualifications are bought or taken by someone else. There is no actual combat practice, and the investment lineup is all the same. They don't show you the debts in the account books behind the scenes. What they are best at is grabbing the most useful benefits, and are eager to reap the benefits in order to make their financial reports look better to the financial backers and to pad the liquidity in their pockets.
Keep it simple and be a player who fears power but not morality.
Common people are captured by common laws, and low-level players are captured and harvested by low-level common laws.
In fact, many of these makeshift teams have unknown debts and even no stable income. Are they trying to break through all resistance levels with a big positive line? Are they trying to buy off more people by repeatedly testing the key positions of people's hearts?
Companies and organizations understand the quality of a project better than the market, so they run faster and grab the meat faster.
It’s not that encryption has no opportunities, but at this stage of development, perhaps new changes are brewing.
The bull market cannot be judged by simple cycles in the past, but rather——
Are there any new ways of playing that can support more capital participation?
Is there a new model that can reduce negative-sum games and enable the industry to further develop?
A bull market without wealth-creating effect and bumper harvest is a fake bull market.
Poverty breeds evil schemes, while wealth breeds conscience.
The project owners are poor, the VCs are poor, the institutions are poor, and the exchanges are poor. They just have a stronger ability to control funds than the leeks, but you can actually be more free.
(It is also recommended that the organizers be more rational in their comments).
Waiting for a revolutionary gameplay to emerge, when all institutions and KOLs will flock to it, creating a spontaneous climax and everyone will be intoxicated.
