đThe Catizen project has stirred up quite the conversationâbut for all the wrong reasons.đ Imagine investing your time into a game, only to find that your reward is a mere two tokens. Yes, two. Thatâs what most participants got in the airdrop. Meanwhile, those who spent big on in-game purchases walked away with hefty rewards.
It raises a tough question: Is this project really about building a community, or is it just catering to the highest spenders? The selective reward system has left many feeling frustrated. When the majority of players receive little to nothing, it starts to look more like exploitation than community-building.
Now, take a look at other launches like $NOT and $DOGS. Both started at humble prices but made sure to allocate sizable token rewards to their communities, fostering loyalty and a sense of ownership. Compare that to Catizenâs approach, and itâs easy to see why thereâs doubt about the projectâs future.
However, what if thereâs more to this strategy? Could limiting airdrop rewards be a move to stabilize the tokenâs price, preventing massive dumps when it hits exchanges? Some speculate the Cati token could soar to $0.50 or even $2, turning those two tokens into gold. Itâs a bold play, and if Catizen pulls it off, it could become the first Telegram mini-app to make serious waves in the blockchain world.
But if they miss the mark, itâll be another case of over-promising and under-delivering, leaving the community disillusioned. The stakes are high, and all eyes are on the Cati token. Is this a stroke of marketing genius or a project favoring only big spenders? Time will tell.
