2024, this is a number filled with the smell of gunpowder, full of unknowns and variables. On the other side of the ocean, the quadrennial political competition has once again attracted the attention of the world. Trump, a familiar name, with his usual toughness and unpredictability, has once again returned to the center of this competition. The one who is facing him is Kamala Harris, a female politician who has made history. This duel is not only a contest between two candidates, but also a collision of two concepts and two futures.
Rasmussen, Emerson, The New York Times... These names are always closely linked to "polls" during the election campaign. The latest data, like a barometer of the election campaign, affects the hearts of countless people. This time, these numbers seem to have lost their former decisiveness. Trump and Harris' support rates are comparable, and the election situation is deadlocked. No one dares to easily assert the final winner.
Trump's return is more like a carefully planned "nostalgia trip". He will take voters back to the era of rapid economic growth, the era of "America First". Tax cuts and deregulation, policies that once injected a shot in the arm for the US economy, are now being brought to the stage again by Trump and become his "magic weapon" to attract voters. He knows that in this era full of uncertainty, people are eager to return to the past, to that familiar and safe harbor.
Harris, on the other hand, represents another voice, a voice that looks to the future. She focuses on social equity, education, health care, and climate change, issues that are closely related to people's daily lives. She promises to create a better future for all Americans, a fairer and more inclusive future. Her campaign manifesto is like a ray of sunshine in winter, warming those who are full of hope for the future.
Two voices and two choices have torn American society into two camps. Most of those who support Trump are those who have experienced the glorious era of the American economy. They miss that era full of hope and believe that Trump can lead the United States back to its peak. Those who support Harris are younger and more diverse. They are eager for change and a fairer and more inclusive society. They believe that Harris can lead them to a better future. Swing states are always the most exciting in the election. Voters in these states are often those who are still hesitant and waiting. They will listen carefully to the political views of each candidate, weigh the pros and cons of each option, and finally make their own choices. Their choices often determine the direction of the entire election.
This time, swing states such as Michigan and Wisconsin have become the focus of competition between Harris and Trump. Harris's proposals on infrastructure construction and green economic development are highly consistent with the expectations of voters in these states and have won the support of many people. Trump's influence in these states has declined, and he needs to come up with more powerful policies to reverse the decline.
Debates are an indispensable part of an election campaign. Here, candidates face voters directly, explain their political ideas, and respond to their opponents' questions. Every debate is a war without gunpowder, testing the candidates' wisdom, eloquence, and adaptability.
In the debate with Trump, Harris showed her calm and capable side. She had clear logic and sharp words. She used data and facts to respond to Trump's attacks one by one and clearly explained her own policy proposals. Trump continued his usual style of exaggerated language and emotional excitement, trying to overwhelm his opponent with momentum, but sometimes he also seemed illogical and even self-contradictory.
Social media has become an indispensable part of modern political life. Candidates can directly interact with voters through social media platforms, promote their political ideas, and expand their influence.
Trump is well versed in the "rules of the game" of social media. He knows how to use social media to attract attention and create topics. He uses humorous language and a friendly style. He often posts some content on social media to interact with voters and narrow the distance between him and voters. Harris pays more attention to using social media platforms to spread her own policy propositions. She will regularly publish some policy interpretations on education, medical care, climate change, etc., and interact with voters online to answer voters' questions. Economic issues have always been one of the issues that voters are most concerned about. After experiencing the impact of the epidemic, the US economy has recovered slowly, inflation is serious, and the unemployment rate remains high. These problems have become "pain points" in the hearts of voters.
Trump used economic issues as his campaign's "trump card". He promised to make the US economy great again and create more jobs for the American people. He advocated tax cuts and deregulation to stimulate economic growth. Harris, on the other hand, paid more attention to the inclusive development of the economy. She advocated increasing investment in education, medical care and other fields to increase people's income level and narrow the gap between the rich and the poor.
Epidemics, wars, natural disasters... The world is full of uncertainty. People are anxious and confused about the future. They yearn for a more stable and better future.
Trump's supporters place their hopes on the slogan "Make America Great Again". They believe that Trump can lead the United States out of difficulties and return to the top of the world. Harris' supporters place their hopes on a "more equitable and more inclusive" future. They believe that Harris can lead the United States to a better tomorrow.
The 2024 US presidential election is destined to be an election full of suspense and uncertainty. The two candidates represent two different ideas and two different futures. In the end, who will win the election depends on the choice of the voters and the expectations of the American people for the future.
The election horn has been sounded. Every speech, every debate, and every policy confrontation is like a chess piece falling on the chessboard, affecting the changes in the entire situation. Trump is well aware of the psychology of voters. He has portrayed himself as an "outsider" who dares to challenge traditions and break conventions. He uses simple, direct, and even somewhat vulgar language to criticize the "elite class" in Washington, catering to the psychology of voters who are dissatisfied with the status quo and eager for change. He points the finger at immigrants and trading partners, and blames the various problems facing the United States on external factors, trying to arouse the nationalist sentiment hidden in people's hearts and unite them around him.
Harris, on the other hand, has a completely different style from Trump. She is calm, rational, and friendly. She uses passionate and contagious speeches to describe a better future for voters. She focuses on issues such as social equity, racial equality, and climate change, and tries to win the support of voters who are eager for change and hope with more inclusive and progressive ideas. She positions herself as a "listener" and a "problem solver," trying to win the trust of voters with a sincere and pragmatic attitude.
The election is a war without the smoke of gunpowder, and the media is an indispensable "weapon" in this war. Newspapers, television, the Internet, and various media platforms have become the "battlefields" for candidates to promote themselves and attack their opponents. Trump is well versed in the laws of media communication. He is good at creating topics and attracting attention. Even if he is criticized or ridiculed, it can bring him attention. He uses social media as his "mouthpiece", bypassing the "blockade" of traditional media and directly conveying his voice to voters.
Harris pays more attention to the power of traditional media. She actively accepts interviews, participates in TV debates, and takes every opportunity to explain her policy ideas to voters and demonstrate her leadership ability. She knows that in this era of information explosion, winning the support of the media is equivalent to winning half of the voters.
The election is also a game of money. Huge campaign funds support every speech, every trip, and every advertisement of the candidates. Trump relies on the wealth he has accumulated in the business world and the donations from his supporters to have strong financial strength. He prints his name on hats, T-shirts, and even coffee cups, turning the campaign into a large-scale "commercial marketing" to attract voters who agree with his ideas and are willing to pay for him.
Harris relies more on financial support from within the Democratic Party and donations from the grassroots. She has made her campaign a "people's movement," calling on every supporter to contribute their own strength and strive to achieve a common goal.
Time is the most precious resource in this election campaign. As voting day draws closer, every day becomes more precious. Trump has been traveling non-stop between states, holding campaign rallies one after another, igniting the enthusiasm of his supporters with his inflammatory language. He knows that at the last minute, mobilizing the enthusiasm of his supporters is the key to winning the election.
Harris pays more attention to strategy and efficiency. She devotes her limited time and energy to the most critical states and issues. She organizes volunteers to carry out door-to-door propaganda, communicates with voters through telephone and Internet, and strives for every vote she can get.
The United States in 2024 stands at a crossroads of history. The shadow of the epidemic has not yet dissipated, economic recovery is faltering, social divisions are becoming increasingly severe, and the international situation is changing rapidly. People are confused, anxious, and uneasy. They are eager for change and a better future.
Trump and Harris represent two completely different choices. One is an "adventure" full of unknowns and risks, and the other is a "change" full of hope and challenges. In the end, who can lead the United States out of the predicament and towards a better future? The answer lies in the hands of the American people.
This election is not just a contest between two candidates, but also a collision of two values and two development models. It will have a profound impact on the future of the United States and the world.
We cannot predict the final outcome, but we believe that whoever ultimately enters the White House will shoulder the historical responsibility and lead the American people to meet future challenges.
This election campaign has touched the hearts of countless people and has also triggered people's thinking about American politics, economy, society and other aspects.
Trump's re-election and the support he received reflect the dissatisfaction of some people in American society with the status quo and their distrust of traditional political elites. They are eager for change and a leader who can represent their interests and speak for them.
Harris's emergence represents the trend of diversity and inclusiveness in American society. As the first female vice president, the first African-American and the first Asian-American vice president, she has broken the "ceiling" of American politics and brought hope to those groups that have long been marginalized.
This election campaign also highlighted the division and confrontation in American society. Racial issues, immigration issues, and economic inequality, which have long plagued American society, have been further magnified in this election campaign and have become "weapons" for both sides to attack each other.
The rise of social media has further exacerbated this division and confrontation. False information, hate speech, and online violence, the "dark side" of social media, were fully exposed in this election campaign, and also brought new challenges to the American democratic system.
The 2024 US presidential election is destined to become a significant chapter in American history. It will not only determine the future direction of the United States, but will also have a profound impact on the world situation.
We cannot predict the final outcome, but we believe that whoever ultimately enters the White House will shoulder the historical responsibility and lead the American people to meet future challenges.
