The presidential debate between Trump and Harris has come to an end. The two political giants confronted each other on key issues such as employment, medical care, and war, but did not mention cryptocurrency at all? Is this debate a contest of strategy or a firm stance?
In the debate, Trump faced his female opponent Harris, changed his previous tough stance against Biden, and showed a strategy of using softness to overcome hardness, frequently retreating to advance, with little eye contact, and a clear defensive posture. Harris stared at Trump with a sharp gaze throughout the whole process, and her words were both powerful and graceful. She was as focused as a little fan girl, but she seemed to be at ease in the debate, showing extraordinary debating skills and feminine charm. This debate is not only a confrontation of policies, but also a wonderful display of style and strategy.
From employment to medical care, from war to strategy, the debate between Trump and Harris allowed us to witness the collision of political wisdom and art. Although cryptocurrency failed to become the focus, the sparks of this debate were enough to illuminate people's hearts. Who do you think performed better? Is it Trump's calm defense or Harris's passionate offense?