I haven't paid attention to copycats for a long time. Front is too ridiculous. This is a token replacement.
I didn't expect that the coin that made money last year would be so unscrupulous!
Generally, when a project party changes its coin and changes its name, it at least means that it wants to do something. The project party is becoming more and more unscrupulous
The story of FRONT changing its name and changing its coin was spread at the beginning of the year, and the logic of many people buying it at that time was also simple, that is, changing its name and changing its coin.
The price at that time was fluctuating around 0.35u, and the hype expectation went all the way from 0.3- to around 3u, and then the guillotine. The story at that time was that the investment at the beginning of the year was harvested at the end of the year. It felt that the time was too long, especially because I didn't think the "bull market" could last so long, so I didn't invest, and I didn't look at the "token model" carefully at that time. Now it looks a bit interesting.
Here I mainly talk about several major "innovations" after FRONT changed its coin to SLF.
1. The tokens given to users are exchanged at a 1:1 ratio to create the impression that the total amount remains unchanged;
2. The total amount of tokens has quadrupled, and the note is "mining", which makes people feel that it is not "doubled" immediately;
3. FDV quadrupled immediately, and the void doubled, and no money was spent;
4. FRONT circulated 70M, and SLF directly circulated 97M. The extra 27M is currently worth 15M, and I don't know whose pocket it went into;
To sum it up, it can be said in one sentence: the money was earned secretly, and the leeks didn't even notice it.
#FRONT #以太坊基金会 #美联储何时降息? #非农就业数据即将公布