How should retail investors view the latest judicial interpretations of the Supreme People's Court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and how to ensure that they are not involved in illegal activities and "black U"? Three senior lawyers, OTC merchants and security product professionals will provide you with in-depth interpretation! #安全出金小常识 #法律诉讼 #合规 #3friends #usdt各种套路合集

Against the backdrop of the ever-changing global cryptocurrency regulation. On August 19, the Supreme People's Court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate of China jointly issued an interpretation on several issues concerning the application of law in handling criminal cases of money laundering, which clearly listed "virtual asset" transactions as one of the methods of money laundering. The "interpretation" has caused widespread discussion in the industry, and some traffic media and users have many misunderstandings about the "interpretation". After paying attention to the response of the market and the community, we are also thinking about how to promote the stability and transparency of the industry on the basis of compliance, while promoting growth and innovation? At 22:00 on the evening of August 28 (UTC+8), 137Labs, OKLink and many industry experts jointly held an X Space with the theme of [In-depth interpretation of the judicial interpretation of the "two highs" to clarify the identification standards of money laundering crimes, "virtual asset" transactions are included, where is the future of the crypto industry? ]