By comparing the following three specific application scenarios with #ETH and #Solana , we can find the huge application market of RAM:

(I) Low latency, high throughput data such as high-frequency trading and complex #DeFi

Features: High-frequency trading and complex DeFi require processing of large amounts of transaction data and require low latency and high throughput.

Why RAM is the most suitable: RAM's independent resource model allows efficient storage and fast access to data. Physical RAM can reach nanosecond speeds. Combined with its high throughput and low latency characteristics, it can support tens of thousands of high-frequency transactions per second and handle complex DeFi interactions.

Limitations of ETH and Solana: ETH's high transaction fees and low throughput make it unsuitable for high-frequency trading. Although Solana has high throughput, it is not as flexible as Spring in resource allocation and management. It cannot maintain the same performance under high load and support highly complex applications.

Case: From the perspective of market value comparison, Defi is still the largest application market for blockchain. The transaction volume of derivatives has exceeded the transaction volume of spot products, making it the leader of Defi. The derivatives market such as perpetual contracts has a high reliance on transaction speed, which is highly compatible with RAM performance. Spring may become the most suitable blockchain software for complex perpetual contracts and the lowest cost DEX.