Highlights
Changes in Bitcoin Granger cause changes in the forward inflation rate.A one-standard-deviation shock to Bitcoin results in a persistent increase in expected inflation.The relation between Bitcoin and inflation is not driven by the pandemic.
This study examines the time-series relation between Bitcoin and forward inflation expectation rates. Using a vector autoregressive process, we find that changes in Bitcoin Granger cause changes in the forward inflation rate. Furthermore, imposing an exogenous shock to Bitcoin’s price results in a persistent increase in the forward inflation rate. Our findings provide support for the notion that Bitcoin may be used as a hedge against inflation as changes in the price of Bitcoin tend to lead changes in the expected inflation.
Introduction
The market capitalization for Bitcoin recently eclipsed a trillion dollars. Practitioners and some researchers have suggested that Bitcoin is a viable hedge against inflation. For instance, in May of 2020, Bloomberg News reported that hedge fund manager Paul Tudor Jones responded to concerns about the expansionary policy by many of the world’s central banks during the Covid-19 pandemic by purchasing Bitcoin.
Likewise, MicroStrategy Inc., the largest publicly traded business intelligence company, raised its holdings of Bitcoin in February of 2021 by about 20,000 coins because it believes the cryptocurrency to be a “dependable store of value”.2Unlike traditional currencies, Bitcoin has a fixed limit of 21 million coins and trades in a decentralized unregulated system. Schilling and Uhlig (2019) provide a theoretical overview of the interaction between Bitcoin and a more traditional currency that is supplied by a central bank. The authors allow the supply of Bitcoin to grow deterministically and show that Bitcoin can be considered a viable, albeit volatile medium of exchange.The strong demand for, limited supply of, and monetization of Bitcoin gives it the potential to protect against rising prices, which fits the definition of inflation hedge implied by Reilly et al. (1970) and Cagan (1974).
In contrast to the hedging arguments above, other economists have suggested that Bitcoin is simply a speculative investment that does not resemble anything like a traditional monetary instrument. In fact, the Federal Reserve Chairman, Jerome Powell, stated in March of 2021 that cryptocurrencies are “highly volatile and therefore not really useful stores of value… a speculative asset that is essentially a substitute for gold rather than for the dollar”. Baur et al. (2018) provide empirical evidence that Bitcoin is uncorrelated with traditional assets such as stocks, bonds, or commodities, suggesting it is mainly used as a speculative investment. Furthermore, Peetz and Mall (2017) argue that Bitcoin is not a transaction currency for a variety of reasons such as the difficulty to value, the lack of intrinsic worth, and its limited transaction capacity.
Given the conflicting opinions regarding Bitcoin as a potential inflation hedge, a structural analysis of both Bitcoin and expected inflation seems warranted. In this study, we conduct a variety of multivariate time-series tests to examine the lead–lag relation between Bitcoin and the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 5-year forward inflation expectation rates. According to Branch (1974), Fama and MacBeth (1974), and Oudet (1973), a security is an inflation hedge if its returns are independent of the rate of inflation. As noted by Bodie (1976), such independence can be loosely defined as a positive correlation between the nominal rate of return on a particular asset and the rate of inflation.
Results from our multivariate time-series tests are striking. First, we find that changes in the price of Bitcoin Granger (1969) cause changes in the forward inflation rate. However, the opposite direction of causation is not observed. We then estimate a series of vector autoregressive (VAR) equations, where both changes in Bitcoin and changes in the forward inflation rate are treated endogenously. We impose an exogenous shock of the change in Bitcoin and estimate impulse response functions for changes in the forward inflation rate. Interestingly, accumulated impulse response functions become positive shortly after the exogenous stock to the change in Bitcoin. Moreover, the results are robust across the pre- and post-Covid periods and the inclusion of several different lags in the VAR framework.
Our findings provide general support for the idea that Bitcoin could be used as a viable hedge against inflation as its returns are not only positively correlated with the future inflation expectation rate, but tend to lead it. Thus, our results contribute to the broad literature that focuses on inflation hedging.
In particular, Narayan et al. (2019) show that the growth rate in Bitcoin is related to Indonesia’s monetary aggregates. Their empirical results suggest that, in the case of Indonesia, changes in Bitcoin are directly related to inflation. Our findings also tangentially contribute to the growing body of research regarding the efficiency of Bitcoin.The relation we find between Bitcoin and the forward inflation rate could stem from structural differences in the respective markets where these instruments trade or it could be an indication of where prices are being discovered.
Section snippets
Data description
The data used throughout the analysis are obtained from two primary sources. From CoinMarketCap, we gather daily prices in Bitcoin for the two-year period that ranges from January 1st, 2019 to December 31st, 2020. During this same period, we gather the 5-Year Forward Inflation Expectation Rate (T5YIFR) from the St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank. This rate is defined as follows:

We estimate both the likelihood ratio test and Akaike’s information criterion and determine that the appropriate number of lags in Eq. (3) falls between one and five. To determine the proper ordering of the above VAR model, we begin by estimating Granger
Conclusion
We find that changes in Bitcoin Granger cause changes in the forward inflation rate, but not vice-versa. We also find strong evidence that an unexpected increase in the price of Bitcoin is associated with a significant and persistent increase in the forward inflation rate. The findings in this paper have important implications for both investment managers and policymakers. First, our results suggest that Bitcoin can act as a hedge against expected inflation. This is important for investment
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
#Write2Earn! #BTC☀ #inflations

Let Me Explain:
- 📉 Prices Reflect Supply and Demand: Prices are just exchange rates; when you swap USD for goods, you're trading one thing for another.
- 💵 Unlimited USD Supply: The Fed can create dollars with a keystroke—no real resources required. This makes USD abundant and less valuable over time.
- 🏗️ Goods & Services Are Scarce: Unlike USD, goods and services require time, effort, energy, and materials to produce, making them inherently more valuable.
- 🔄 USD Prices Trend to Infinity: Since USD supply is limitless, prices of goods in USD rise because the currency becomes weaker over time.
💥 Visit My Pinned post to get profitable insight
🔗 In Contrast: Bitcoin’s Scarcity
- ⛏️ Bitcoin Has a Fixed Supply: Only a limited amount of Bitcoin can be produced every 10 minutes, with the rate halving every 4 years.
- 📉 Decreasing Bitcoin Issuance: As time goes on, Bitcoin's supply grows slower, while we get better at producing goods and services.
- 🛑 Bitcoin Hoarding Effect: Many holders keep their BTC, anticipating rising purchasing power, making it even scarcer in circulation.
💡 The Big Picture:
- 🔄 Goods & Services vs. BTC: As the supply of goods rises and BTC supply falls, the prices of goods in BTC terms will trend down.
- 💸 USD Inflation vs. BTC Deflation: Dollars can be printed endlessly, inflating prices. Bitcoin’s capped supply drives its value higher over time.
- 🏡 Long-Term Value Shift: A house's price in USD will keep rising, but in BTC terms, it will fall, highlighting Bitcoin’s superior scarcity and value retention.
🌟 Bottom Line: Everything becomes cheaper in Bitcoin terms because BTC's supply is capped while everything else keeps growing. 🪙📉 #BTC☀ #inflations #scarcity $BTC

As 2024 draws to a close, speculation in the digital currency market has intensified around whether Bitcoin could indeed reach the $100,000 mark. Recent analysis and reports highlight several supportive factors, although challenges remain that could impact this forecast.
Key Factors Supporting Bitcoin's Rise
1. Institutional Support: In recent months, major investment firms like BlackRock and Fidelity have incorporated Bitcoin into their strategies, driving demand and liquidity. This trend suggests that digital assets are increasingly viewed as potential hedges against inflation and market volatility, attracting more institutional investors.
2. Political Influence: The election of Donald Trump, who is considered supportive of digital assets, may encourage a more favorable regulatory environment, allowing more investors to participate. Trump's policies are anticipated to foster innovation and interest in digital currencies like Bitcoin.
3. Inflation Hedge Appeal: With inflation rates climbing worldwide, Bitcoin’s limited supply has made it attractive as a hedge against inflation. Investors seeking protection for their capital may find Bitcoin to be an appealing option.
4. Technological Developments: Innovations such as the Lightning Network have improved transaction efficiency and lowered costs, enhancing Bitcoin’s usability and building user trust. As transaction speed and efficiency increase, so does adoption, which boosts market value.
Challenges and Obstacles
1. Price Volatility: Despite optimism, Bitcoin remains highly volatile, which can lead to sharp declines even during bullish periods. Individual investors might find this level of risk hard to handle, which could limit capital flow.
2. Regulatory Hurdles: Stringent regulations in countries like the United States and China could negatively affect the market. Strict policies might restrict trading and dampen investor enthusiasm.
Analysts’ Views on Bitcoin’s Future
Some analysts believe Bitcoin could benefit from a “supercycle” that may push its value to unprecedented levels beyond $100,000.

Sources:
1. Bitcoin CryptoSlate.
3. Bloomberg Crypto.
4. Investopedia.
#BitcoinAnalysis" #DOGSONBINANCE #inflations #Debate2024 #solonapumping

With inflation climbing to 2.6%, all eyes are on the crypto market—and here’s a bold call: $BTC could face a bearish hit on November 15. 📉
Why This Matters:
As inflation eats away at purchasing power, traditional investors often look to Bitcoin as a hedge. But with November 15 looming, some insiders are hinting at a potential dip for BTC.
🔥 Will we see Bitcoin’s bullish momentum pause or even reverse? Could be the perfect time to watch for buying opportunities if BTC pulls back as expected.
Mark this date and keep your alerts on—November 15 could be the day the market shifts!
#Bitcoin #BTC☀ #inflations