The Kamala-Trump debate is now over, and the mainstream media is rushing to declare her the winner. But Americans aren’t buying it.
Kamala carried herself as a typical politician, sticking to rehearsed talking points and failing to address the core issues facing the country.
Speaking of rehearsed talking points, Trump quickly called her out on an economic “sound bite” that was apparently fed to her.
“That’s just a sound bite. They gave her that to say,” Trump declared before retorting, “She doesn't have a plan [for the economy]. She copied Biden's plan. And it's like four sentences, like, 'Run, Spot, run.’”
On the topic of abortion, Kamala declared, “The freedom to make decisions about one's own body should not be made by the government.”
But whoopsie. Kamala forgot that her administration denied that same freedom to Americans when Biden’s vaccine mandates essentially forced 100 million American workers to “get vaccinated” or lose their jobs.
While you’re here, don’t forget to follow this page for more threads like this one and weekly news roundups each Sunday.
Then, the moderators jumped into the debate to defend Kamala Harris.
Megyn Kelly lamented, “The absolute gall of ABC to keep ‘fact-checking’ ONLY Trump while letting her lie in every answer is infuriating.”
This exchange captures the tone of the entire night, as David Muir—known for giving Kamala Harris 100% positive news coverage—focused on “fact-checking” Trump in real-time as he detailed reports of eaten pets in Springfield, Ohio.
Kamala went as low as to push the “bloodbath” and “very fine people” hoax that were debunked by even the mainstream media.
Trump’s “bloodbath” comments were in reference to the auto industry, while Kamala failed to deliver the full context of Trump’s “very fine people” comments with respect to Charlottesville.
Of course, the moderators offered no fact-checks on Kamala’s false claims.
In a surprise moment, ABC's Linsey Davis challenged Kamala on her socialist ideas to do away with private insurance.
"In 2017, you supported Bernie Sanders' proposal to do away with private insurance and create a government-run healthcare system."
Like fracking, Kamala pushed the idea that her values "haven't changed" while reversing course on every policy idea that doesn’t benefit her chances of winning.
Kamala also said she and Tim Walz were proud gun owners and wouldn't take away anyone's guns.
She forgot that she literally called for a gun "buy-back program" on NBC News.
While Democrats push the idea that Trump is a “threat to Democracy,” he flipped the script on them, mentioning the fact that the Democrats staged a palace coup against Biden before coronating Kamala as the nominee.
Speaking of Joe Biden, Trump asked on stage before millions of people, “Where is our President?”
“We have a president that doesn't know he's alive,” he declared as he mentioned the Democrats “threw him out of a campaign like a dog.”
Trump continued to go on offense regarding the crisis at the border, which has resulted in millions of illegal aliens pouring into the country.
Trump challenged Kamala to leave the debate immediately and convince President Biden to sign an executive order to close the border, saying she could wake Joe Biden up from his nap and get it done today.
Kamala made the mistake of accusing Trump of dividing the country based on race.
But whoopsie. Her hypocrisy was exposed as she failed to acknowledge that there’s a video of her nodding in agreement with the idea of special laws for Black people.
Kamala’s closing statements fell flat as she made the pitch to the American people that voting for her is voting for “a new way forward.”
Except there’s one harsh reality: she's literally been in power for 3.5 years.
In the final moments, Trump delivered a crushing blow to Kamala Harris, mentioning that she continues to promise “wonderful things” but hasn’t done anything while in power to fix it.
He harped on the Biden-Harris administration’s disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan that resulted in 13 US soldiers dead, saying, “I rebuilt our entire military. She gave a lot of it away to the Taliban. She gave it to Afghanistan.”
In his ending sentence, Trump called the Biden-Harris duo “the worst president” and “the worst vice president in the history of our country.” #CryptoMarketMoves #DOGSONBINANCE #TelegramCEO #KamalaTrumpdebate #KamalaHarris2024

In a recent announcement, Kamala Harris unveiled a plan to increase the child tax credit to $6,000 per child for the first year if elected ¹. This proposal surpasses Senator JD Vance's suggestion of $5,000 and reignites the debate on Capitol Hill.
▶️Key Highlights:
🔸Increased Support: Harris's plan aims to provide substantial financial assistance to families during the initial year, acknowledging the significant expenses associated with raising infants.
🔸Economic Policy: This proposal is part of Harris's broader economic agenda, focusing on aiding first-time homebuyers and addressing "price gouging" by food companies.
🔸Contrast to Vance's Proposal: Harris's $6,000 proposal exceeds Vance's $5,000 suggestion, sparking discussion and comparison between the two plans.
▶️Context and Implications:
🔸Previous Initiatives: In 2021, the Biden-Harris administration temporarily increased the child tax credit to $3,600 per child, demonstrating a commitment to supporting families ².
🔸Political Discourse: Harris's proposal has drawn attention from political opponents, with Vance mocking the idea on social media ¹.
🔸Fiscal Implications: The increased child tax credit would provide significant financial relief to families, but its impact on the federal budget and taxation policies remains to be discussed.
▶️Stay Informed:
As the debate unfolds, it's essential to stay updated on the proposals and their potential implications. Follow reliable sources for the latest news and analysis on this critical issue.

#FinancialAssistance #economicgrowth #KamalaHarris2024 #FinancialCaution

A proposed 25% tax on unrealized gains would undoubtedly stir significant controversy, and if Vice President Kamala Harris were to support such a measure, it could lead to substantial backlash. Unrealized gains refer to the increase in value of an asset that has not yet been sold. Taxing these gains before they are realized could be seen as unfair, as it forces individuals to pay taxes on income they have not actually received.
Critics argue that this type of taxation could particularly hurt small investors, retirees, and those who rely on long-term investments for financial security. It might also create economic instability, as investors could be forced to sell assets prematurely to cover the tax bill, potentially leading to market volatility.
Furthermore, implementing such a tax would be administratively complex and could face legal challenges. Many see it as a radical departure from traditional tax principles, where taxes are typically levied on actual income or profits.
If Kamala Harris were to push for such a policy, it could alienate moderate voters and further polarize the political landscape, leading to significant opposition and potentially harming her political standing.#KamalaHarris2024 #Texas #VOTEme #kamala