Buy Book Of Matt Furie (BOM)

XRP, the fourth largest cryptocurrency by market capitalization, ended February nearly 30% down as the broader crypto market saw selling pressure due to various macroeconomic concerns.

XRP's price experienced a notable decline in February as a broader crypto sell-off spurred a market shift away from riskier assets. XRP had a stellar start to the year, skyrocketing to a seven-year high of $3.39 amid optimism of a spot crypto ETF and a favorable regulatory outlook; XRP concluded January up 45.35%.

card

Notably, XRP has been on a bull run since November, with increases of 282% and 6% in the final two months of 2024, followed by a 45% gain in January.

However, February saw a slowdown for XRP's price, marking its first red month since November 2024. XRP fell from around $3 to below $2, hitting a low of $1.95 on Feb. 28 before recovering.

At the time of writing, XRP was up 3.84% in the last 24 hours to $2.26, continuing its recovery from March 1.

As eyes are peeled on where XRP trends next, historical trends suggest that March could bring a much-needed recovery. Since 2021, XRP has consistently closed March in the green, often building on momentum from February. Even in 2023, when February ended in the red, XRP still managed to finish March with gains.

What history suggests

As March kicks off on a positive note for XRP, the market is watching for signs of a sustained rebound. Looking at XRP's performance over the last four years, the cryptocurrency concluded March in the green, indicating that a rebound is possible if history repeats itself.

card

In 2021 for instance, XRP gained momentum in February and carried it into March, posting strong gains of 180% per TradingView data. In 2022, a similar pattern emerged, with March delivering a positive close of 4.31%.

In March 2023, despite a red February, XRP managed to rebound and close March in the green with gains of 42.98%. In 2024, XRP repeated the trend, closing March with gains of 7.25%.

While history suggests a rebound, it’s important to bear in mind that past performance might not be a guarantee of future results. XRP price might be impacted by broader market conditions and developments in the XRPL ecosystem or the Ripple SEC lawsuit.

With March historically favoring XRP, all eyes are on whether XRP will stage a recovery despite February’s losses.

Will $SOL Solana’s Price Recover or Drop Further?

Solana has been a strong performer in the crypto market, gaining big during bullish trends. But after hitting a peak above $280, it has been under selling pressure and is now trading around $143. Investors are wondering if the downtrend is ending or if more losses are coming.

Currently, Solana is at a key support level, with some indicators suggesting a possible bounce. The RSI shows SOL is oversold, meaning a recovery could happen soon. However, the overall market trend is still bearish, leaving the possibility of further declines.

Solana has been in a downward trend since reaching its peak. The price recently bounced from the $140 support level, which has been important in the past. Even though this has provided temporary relief, SOL is still showing a bearish pattern, making traders cautious.

The key question remains: Has Solana hit its lowest point, or will selling pressure push it even lower? The coming weeks will be crucial in determining its next move.

Disclaimer:
The information provided is for informational and educational purposes only and should not be considered financial, investment, or legal advice. We do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of any information presented. Any financial decisions you make based on this content are at your own risk. Always conduct your own research and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Investing involves risk, and past performance is not indicative of future results. We are not responsible for any losses or damages resulting from your actions.

The North Korean Bybit hackers are nearing the final stages of laundering the stolen 499,000 ETH, worth approximately $1.5 billion. At their current pace, they could complete this process within the next three days.

Meanwhile, this comes amid criticism of USDC stablecoin issuer Circle for allegedly delaying action on blacklisting wallets linked to the attack.

North Korean Hackers Ramp Up Bybit Laundering Efforts

On March 1, the North Korean hackers moved another 62,200 ETH, valued at around $138 million, reducing the remaining unlaundered balance to 156,500 ETH.

According to crypto investigator EmberCN, who has been monitoring the transactions, the rapid movement of funds suggests the laundering process could be completed in a matter of days.

“Since the hacker resumed money laundering yesterday at 3 PM, they have laundered 62,200 ETH (worth $138 million). Out of the 499,000 ETH stolen from Bybit, only 156,000 ETH (worth $346 million) remain unlaundered. In about three more days, all of it should be fully laundered,” EmberCN wrote on X.

Bybit Hacker Ethereum Holdings. Source: X/EmberCN

This confirms a report from blockchain intelligence firm TRM Labs, which noted that the attackers had “an unprecedented level of operational efficiency.”

According to the firm, the group employs a complex laundering strategy, using intermediary wallets, decentralized exchanges, and cross-chain bridges to disguise the movement of funds. These tactics make it increasingly difficult for investigators to track and recover the stolen ETH.

Meanwhile, the authorities have also taken note. On February 27, the FBI identified a North Korean-affiliated hacking collective known as TraderTraitor as the perpetrator of the Bybit attack.

In response, Bybit has launched a $140 million bounty program to incentivize individuals who can help track and freeze the stolen assets. So far, 16 people have received a combined total of $4.2 million for their contributions.

Circle Faces Criticism for Delayed Blacklist

Considering the rapid pace of the laundering activity, on-chain sleuth ZachXBT has criticized Circle for its delayed response in blacklisting hacker-controlled wallets.

He pointed out that the company took more than 24 hours to act, giving the attackers ample time to move the assets beyond reach.

ZachXBT also highlighted past incidents where Circle allegedly failed to freeze illicit funds promptly, referencing major crypto breaches such as the Ledger and Nomad Bridge hacks.

He argued that Circle, as a key stablecoin issuer, should take a more aggressive stance in blocking stolen funds instead of relying solely on law enforcement directives.

Circle’s CEO, Jeremy Allaire, defended the company’s position, dismissing claims of negligence. He stated that Circle only responds to direct requests from authorities.

“We will share a post on how we immediately respond to law enforcement and not front run the law with our own or market intelligence. I don’t think the market or users benefit if a private company makes their own judgements to seize funds without a direct law enforcement request,” Allaire added.

However, ZachXBT responded that waiting for legal clearance creates unnecessary delays, allowing hackers to execute their laundering schemes before action is taken.

“An ongoing attack impacting the entire ecosystem only has minutes for a blacklist. You know this and then push back for a court order from law enforcement which takes multiple days in a best case scenario. Your team completely made up this internal policy and it’s not required by law,” ZachXBT stated.

Security expert Taylor Monahan echoed these concerns, describing Circle’s handling of such incidents as inefficient. She also noted that delays in blacklisting stolen funds increase the likelihood that the assets become untraceable.

“You have a blocklist function because you have to. Grow up and use it. Freeze criminal funds, establish checks and balances, create accessible paths of recourse if it turns out bad and fix it quickly. This is dead simple,” Monahan said.

Additionally, she pointed out that victims of wrongful freezes often face extended legal battles to reclaim their funds due to Circle’s rigid policies.