LIVE
Kriptotrx
@kriptoTRX
Finans eğitimleri ve analiz işlemleri
Following
Followers
Liked
Shared
Good signal
$ATA You will sleep and wake up every day to a new price high😎🚀
See original
About the#binancecase
Contrary to what is said on social media
1- There is not a single accusation against user funds in the investigation.
2- The allegations are entirely about money laundering. (Currently, the money of Russia or other countries embargoed by the USA is considered black money. Keep this in mind as well.) Other allegations regarding terrorism and drug financing are valid for all exchanges. After all, no CV or criminal record is required from the person you KYC.
3- The agreement confirmed Binance's international reliability and authority.
$BTC $BNB $XRP
Contrary to what is said on social media
1- There is not a single accusation against user funds in the investigation.
2- The allegations are entirely about money laundering. (Currently, the money of Russia or other countries embargoed by the USA is considered black money. Keep this in mind as well.) Other allegations regarding terrorism and drug financing are valid for all exchanges. After all, no CV or criminal record is required from the person you KYC.
3- The agreement confirmed Binance's international reliability and authority.
$BTC $BNB $XRP
See original
Binance - BUSD facts
The removal of trading pairs in Binance causes some speculators and those who do not know the market to give incorrect information. It doesn't matter how you buy a commodity, tool or equipment. For example, if you bought BTC from the BTC-BUSD parity, losing the BTC to BUSD parity will not do anything to the BTC in your hand. You bought BTC. You do not have BTC in BUSD parity. As you know, there is BTC. By February, all BUSD parities on Binance will be removed and transactions will continue in other parities such as USDT. Removing the trading pair does not mean #delist . Therefore, you do not need to worry when the trading pair is removed. #Binance #BUSD #usdt $BUSD
#FTX #SBF #FTT
In court today, Gary Wang, co-founder of FTX & Alameda, testified that Sam Bankman-Fried allowed Alameda to dip into FTX customer funds as early as late 2019 / early 2020.
Gary Wang: So at the very end of 2019 or early 2020, I did a database query to check what Alameda's balances were at the time. When I checked, it was negative by more than what FTX's trading revenue was at the time.
Prosecutor: What was the implication of Alameda having a negative balance in excess of FTX's revenue?
Gary Wang: It means that Alameda was taking customers' money.
Prosecutor: What did the defendant (Sam Bankman-Fried) say?
Gary Wang: He asked me, when I was doing this calculation, if I was including the value of Alameda's FTT, which was held in a separate account. He asked me if I was also including that FTT.
Prosecutor: To break this down a little bit, you said Alameda's account was negative in excess of revenue. What was FTX's revenue at the time?
Gary Wang: It was around $150 million.
Prosecutor: What was Alameda's negative balance at the time?
Gary Wang: It was more than that. It was more than that. I think it was around 200 million.
Prosecutor: When you told the defendant that Alameda had a negative balance, what did he tell you to include in the balance calculation?
Gary Wang: He asked me to include the value of all of Alameda's accounts on FTX and include the value of the FTT that was in those accounts.
In court today, Gary Wang, co-founder of FTX & Alameda, testified that Sam Bankman-Fried allowed Alameda to dip into FTX customer funds as early as late 2019 / early 2020.
Gary Wang: So at the very end of 2019 or early 2020, I did a database query to check what Alameda's balances were at the time. When I checked, it was negative by more than what FTX's trading revenue was at the time.
Prosecutor: What was the implication of Alameda having a negative balance in excess of FTX's revenue?
Gary Wang: It means that Alameda was taking customers' money.
Prosecutor: What did the defendant (Sam Bankman-Fried) say?
Gary Wang: He asked me, when I was doing this calculation, if I was including the value of Alameda's FTT, which was held in a separate account. He asked me if I was also including that FTT.
Prosecutor: To break this down a little bit, you said Alameda's account was negative in excess of revenue. What was FTX's revenue at the time?
Gary Wang: It was around $150 million.
Prosecutor: What was Alameda's negative balance at the time?
Gary Wang: It was more than that. It was more than that. I think it was around 200 million.
Prosecutor: When you told the defendant that Alameda had a negative balance, what did he tell you to include in the balance calculation?
Gary Wang: He asked me to include the value of all of Alameda's accounts on FTX and include the value of the FTT that was in those accounts.
See original
#VOXEL WILL BE THE STAR OF THE BOGH
$VOXEL Its structure, its team, the exchanges it is listed on and the fact that it was launched during the bear season are the elements that caught my attention in this project. I follow the project team. I trust that it is a#Binancesupported project and I keep it. We will talk a lot about the name of this token during the bull season. The current price is 0.1422 and, in my experience, it is one of the most solid and cheapest projects in the market. I have confidence in this project. I believe it will provide good opportunities for those who hold it. $BTC $BNB