Taking Binance Square as an example, let’s think about: What strategic value does a content community have for a platform?
For an exchange, its product form is essentially a trading tool. At the peak of the domestic Internet era, someone once said: "A good product should be used and then gone." However, when a platform has gone through the initial growth period of high expansion, especially when the industry is currently in the stage of transitioning from high growth to stock, good products should not be used and then gone. So what strategic value does the Binance Square product have for Binance? 🗝️Article title 1. Discuss the rationality of Binance Square 2. Why is this a product moat that is difficult to replicate?
1. In the past 30 trading days (October 7 to November 15, 2024), Binance’s total trading volume significantly exceeded Nasdaq, New York Stock Exchange, and Coinbase: (1) Exceeding the Nasdaq exchange by 10% and twice the trading volume of the New York Stock Exchange, Coinbase is even more (2) This is a very extraordinary number, because the difference in the volume carried by the two is dozens of times. (3) The current market value of the U.S. stock market is more than 60 trillion, while the total market value of crypto has just exceeded 3 trillion due to the rise of BTC.
What's more, this is still a rough calculation. After all, not all coins can be traded on @binancezh
With such a large size gap, being able to overtake is enough to see that the crypto market, as a financial market with low entry barriers, is very attractive to funds. Especially after Trump took office, the recent actions of all parties seem to have Paving a smooth path for encryption
2. New functions on Binance Square, which are not available on Twitter, iterate more interactive functions during the voice live broadcast process: disk projection and currency link
I think this is very good for friends who are good at the secondary market. Originally, Square could earn profits by posting posts and mining, but now it has added [voice mining]. The principle is actually to promote transactions through opinions and then obtain The handling fee is divided and there is no entry threshold
You can slide down the home page to enter the square interface, and then select live broadcast in the bottom column of the post to start it, both real-time and scheduled.
In addition, some communities actually use this function to solve problems and hold meetings very smoothly. Why do I say this? I have a friend who told me after experiencing it himself~
LIVE
Eric SJ
--
Two things, both related to Binance financial products income
1. The current highest real-time income of this product [Smart Arbitrage] is the $ETH strategy, with an annual interest rate of up to 63%
2. [Current Account Wealth Management], excluding the tiered income, the real-time annualized rate of U is already 15.5%, plus the tiered income is 22.5%
I just had 3,000 unused, and I saved it in the current account to see the daily income, and I can almost have a pork trotter meal
Briefly explain the income sources of the two products👇🏻
➢ [Smart Arbitrage] is to eat the funding rate, and also adopts the Delta neutral strategy, and the income source is the same as $ENA Almost the same, it also uses long-short hedging to earn yields, but I didn't expect the current market to be so fomo
The annualized yield of Ethereum's arbitrage strategy has reached more than 60%
➢[Current financial management] This is easy to understand. It's not just U. In fact, I basically put all my coins into financial management when there is no spot order. I don't hold U for a long time. Today, there is just 3,000 left in this account to save it...
Its source of income is easier to understand. There are more people borrowing U to buy coins on the platform, and the yield is higher. This real-time annualized rate is 15% apart from the step income, which actually reflects the market situation
(Some are used for the pledge income provided by some protocols themselves)
In principle, these two are basically principal-protected, but let's put aside the principle first. In extreme market conditions, neutral strategies may suffer losses due to excessive price differences between contracts and spot🤣
In the past 24 hours, deBridge's daily transaction volume was 10 million, of which more than half was from the Ethereum system flowing to Solana
There is still a lot of room to reach the target daily transaction volume of 100 million
The two points I am more concerned about in the next V2 version: gas-free transactions and intention transactions
The business model of the cross-chain bridge is easy to understand. As long as someone uses it, there will be cash flow, but the proposal of gas-free transactions makes me feel a little confused and look forward to the details
As for the intention function, especially on the basis of gas-free transactions, the transaction scenario is more liquid for on-chain users. The same-chain intention of deBridge abstracts the binding relationship with the native token of the main chain
If we buy an X token on the Solana chain, we don’t need to sell the original asset to $SOL and then use $SOL to buy this X token
📍It is a bit like treating the assets of the same chain as a complete pool. The assets in the pool can be freely exchanged, for example, like an exchange, using U to buy meme
Therefore, whether it is intention or chain abstraction, a trend I see is the relationship between abstract assets, GAS and chains, which is ultimately to reduce the complexity of user interaction. This is a good development trend
At the end, let me touch on the topic again. If deBridge can achieve gas-free transactions, the daily transaction volume will be hundreds of millions, which is also a short-term foreseeable thing. After all, BSC has successfully demonstrated it through stablecoins before...
It is highly likely that deBridge has also framed a certain condition here, and I will wait for the subsequent details~
LIVE
Eric SJ
--
A set of cross-chain protocol data comparison: Wormhole/deBridge/Axelar
The transaction volume and market value of these three protocols are counted
1. In terms of transaction volume and market value, Wormhole is undoubtedly at a higher comprehensive level
(1) The market value level of deBridge @deBridgeFinance is generally lower than the transaction volume
(2) In contrast, the overall market value level of Axelar @axelar is generally higher than the transaction volume
On the whole, 🔻 deBridge may be at a level that is undervalued by the market. A few months ago, I also gave a detailed introduction to it. You can jump to the tweet to read: 跳转
It should be noted that short-term transaction volume levels cannot refer to the long-term profitability of the protocol, but can only be used as a comparison within a period of time.
Because the official operation time of these protocols after TGE is very different, the short-term comparison is used as a reference.
I will also follow up on this data table for a long time, and will add more indicators for reference later.
2. Since Wormhole and deBridge belong to the Solana ecosystem, I have retrieved the transaction volume share of the two protocols in the past 30 days.
(1) It can be seen that Ethereum accounts for half of Wormhole's transaction volume, and there are some data not added in the chart: probably because the SUI network has been popular in the past period of time. The transaction volume of SUI is about one-quarter, followed by Solana. (2) The overall transaction volume of deBridge is relatively balanced, with Ethereum accounting for 40% and Solana taking the second place, accounting for nearly one-third.
As the cross-chain infrastructure of the Solana ecosystem, Wormhole still meets higher demands in terms of transaction volume. If deBridge is compared with Wormhole's transaction volume and market value, it can be seen from the bar chart below that the ratio is obviously much lower.
The Solana ecosystem in this cycle has shown sufficient vitality, so I will follow up on the phased progress of some ecosystems and infrastructure later.
$LISTA The current price is just right, and it is a good position for both long and short positions, because it is at the lower edge of the relay pattern
You can break through the lower edge to short, or you can subjectively determine that the lower edge support is effective, and the profit and loss ratio of long positions will explode directly
If it goes up again this time, I think the resistance of the upper edge can be ignored, and there is a high probability that it can be directly broken through
If you are shorting, you can also set the stop loss back to the current price. The profit and loss ratio is appropriate, but the target reference point is difficult to find
Contentos: Exploring the Creator Economy and the Public Chain with “Value”
This year I have come into contact with many platforms related to the creator economy, all thanks to the residual heat of SocialFi started by Friend.Tech last year. In fact, there have been several large financings for social protocols this year, but they have always been tepid. Including the protagonist of this article, it was also because of the essay contest on the square that he briefly entered everyone's field of vision. In fact, when it comes to creator economy, in Web2, for example, the well-known apps like WeChat and TikTok, after releasing special express versions, individuals who read the content also have a small income. In Web3, it is actually a similar logic, the platform will give certain benefits to individuals, but because of the token economy and decentralized design of Web3, this income may be magnified dozens of times.
📍K Line Combination Pattern Application — ABCD Zone Trading
It has been a while since I updated this teaching series, and this is a relatively simple trading system I saved last year, which includes buying and selling points. It is somewhat similar to the use of trend line breaks.
It can be used to determine buy and sell point areas, where the buying point is based on a reversal logic, and the selling point is based on a resistance exit logic.
Suitable for naked K right-side trading, buy in the C zone when B enters, sell in the D zone at resistance.
Expand👇🏻
- Pattern Principles 🔻 (1) The initial pattern extends from the A zone, connecting the low and high points of the A zone K line to form and extend other zones. (2) The B zone cannot be used as a buying point area, because once it encounters a major market movement, it will be unable to escape and can only perform reversals when the trend ends. (3) The D zone is the resistance extension area of the A zone, so selling when reaching or being in the D zone is a prudent choice.
- Extension Notes 🔻 (1) Once the market leaves the A zone and enters the B zone, and a large bearish candlestick appears, the current pattern cannot be used as the main trading basis; otherwise, many trading opportunities will be lost. (2) A breakout of the C zone trend line in the B zone is a buying point, but one must guard against false breakouts, so combining the buying point with trading volume analysis is better. (3) Once the market falls back from the C zone to the B zone, sell unconditionally, as this may indicate that the market will continue. (4) This system can serve as a primary reference, but should not be used as a single indicator; it is advisable to combine it with other technical indicators for assessment. (5) The buying point of this indicator is of a right-side style, while the selling point is somewhat left-sided, as the buying point is entered after confirming the breakout, whereas the selling point is based on subjective human assessment of resistance at that point, which may be a local peak.
This article is not long and is relatively easy to understand. Thank you for following @Eric SJ .
Innovation in Token Issuance Methods: 'Let the Elephant in the Room Walk Out'
'We embrace Bitcoin because it saved the world economy from inflation, yet in Web3, we are practicing what we oppose: inflation by scheduled unlocking.' The theme of this article will horizontally expand on the phenomenon of [low circulation high FDV] and the improvement of the [fair launch] paradigm regarding token issuance. Before this👇🏻 I have previously outlined the evolution of token distribution methods over the years, from free airdrops to the recently popular Tap to Earn. Friends interested in this can also revisit: 代币发行发展史
I don't know how many people are simultaneously doing secondary trading while speculating on memes. The entire meme track is actually a microcosm of an industry community.
What you do in the meme track is very challenging for a startup team.
Because the things within memes inherently possess various concepts, memes are not just memes; this is my recent realization.
One moment the meme concept is hot with AI, the next it’s DeSci, and then the next is the Elon Musk concept.
A startup team, in fact, cannot keep up with this kind of concept iteration.
LIVE
Eric SJ
--
There are currently 82 non-TGE game projects in the market that have raised more than 10 million yuan
Today I chatted with two co-founders of games. It feels like they are still alive, but they have actually been gone for a while
I can't explain it to the upper level, and there are not many people in the community, especially this round of Meme fever has lasted almost the whole year. After knowing TGE, the market feedback must be unsatisfactory
There are not many DAUs, but there is a lot of financing. Has TGE become a "Schrödinger state"?
I want to change the direction temporarily but I am afraid of that track: Bang, it was killed in an instant
(Background supplement: One of the people in the communication once tried to turn around and do inscriptions + games, but the inscription market ended quietly in the planning stage)
Recently, $BTC during the day always gives the feeling that it is about to pull back, then shortly after it drops a bit to shake off the weak hands and then it goes back up.
When you thought about opening a short position before sleeping, you wake up to find it has already blown up, and the price hasn't moved at all.
Scalp is tingling!!!
The feeling with the counterfeit is pretty much the same, and even because the market is smaller, the sensation is even stronger.
There are currently 82 non-TGE game projects in the market that have raised more than 10 million yuan
Today I chatted with two co-founders of games. It feels like they are still alive, but they have actually been gone for a while
I can't explain it to the upper level, and there are not many people in the community, especially this round of Meme fever has lasted almost the whole year. After knowing TGE, the market feedback must be unsatisfactory
There are not many DAUs, but there is a lot of financing. Has TGE become a "Schrödinger state"?
I want to change the direction temporarily but I am afraid of that track: Bang, it was killed in an instant
(Background supplement: One of the people in the communication once tried to turn around and do inscriptions + games, but the inscription market ended quietly in the planning stage)
Follow up on $MANTA hours k, looking back now, it has retraced to the previously mentioned 0.618 support level
Then there was a rebound, and currently, it has encountered the resistance line at this level
Therefore, the position at 0.85 is crucial, determining whether the trend will reverse or continue, so strategies around this resistance point can be considered, such as shorting at the current price with a stop loss above 0.85
Or going long in the initial segment after a breakout at 0.85
LIVE
Eric SJ
--
$MANTA The decline is beginning to emerge, the first support is here at 0.8, and the next support is 0.766
MANTA is a new coin launched this year. Although the price is also falling, it is still very strong in making things happen
It is one of the several protocols that came out of the Polkadot ecosystem that I mentioned a few days ago
And now the label of the Polkadot ecosystem has gradually faded
DEXX crashes, similar products under the abstract framework of Thinking Chain
After reading many bloggers’ posts on the DEXX incident in the past two days, I found that the issue of [non-self-hosted private keys] has been widely criticized.
It was only after the incident that I opened the documentation of this platform for the second time. It happened that the concept of [chain abstraction] was mentioned frequently recently. I found that under the framework of chain abstraction, similar and better products may appear in the future, and they will be [self-hosted].
As for DEXX, I believe there are still many people like me who have never downloaded it.
Why was it called "Binance on the chain" during its promotion? It is because it provides a set of product logic similar to that of traditional CEX on the chain.
Infrastructure Research丨Why is the Bitcoin Ecosystem Imperative?
Bitcoin$BTC is already 9w1, why don’t people seem to be excited? Especially those who focus on the Bitcoin ecosystem~ In fact, as Bitcoin reaches new highs, the development of the Bitcoin ecosystem is becoming increasingly important, which has a lot to do with the choice of its underlying consensus mechanism. Because the proof of work adopted by Bitcoin is based on block rewards, but more than one million Bitcoins have been mined. Although this is not achieved in the short term, for the moment, there is actually a sense of urgency. In the later stage, there will be no block rewards, and the main source of rewards for mining machines will only be transaction fees. At this stage, the demand for Bitcoin's on-chain transaction fees is not high. If this trend continues, more mining farms may be eliminated in the future, and security issues may even arise.
$GOAT fell out of the trend line, what? A bet on 1.05?
This position is the first support. Looking at the details of the small cycle, the certainty is still relatively high, but the profit and loss ratio is a little bit worse
But the target can only be seen at 1.05, which is the easiest support point
Another member of the staking ecosystem is added to the airdrop $ZRC to $EIGEN
The core concept of the Zircult protocol involves the Ethereum memory pool, so
Why do you need to know about the Ethereum memory pool (mempool)?
A few days ago, I saw a technical blogger popularizing this concept, which reminded me of the Zircuit document I saw before
At that time, I felt that the description of [Sorter Level Security (SLS)] was really abstract and confusing. After reading the original text, everything became clear when I looked back
The question that really puzzled me was: Does L2 have a Mempool, and what is the significance of improving it for all parties
As far as I know, Arbitrum does not have it. I am ashamed that although I hold $OP positions, I have never learned about Optimism in detail. After reading the original push, I went back to read the Optimism document and saw the mention of private memory pool
Zircuit is a Rollup built on OP Stack, and at the same time in OP The components based on the Stack framework are replaced with zero-knowledge proof logic
At the same time, the core of the business is the concept of memory pool. To put it simply, it is to attach another layer of security to this memory pool through pre-detection and isolation of suspicious transactions
📍More popular explanation: Everyone has queued for nucleic acid. During the queue, the staff will first measure the temperature of the team. If there is an abnormal temperature, they can be taken out for special testing directly
Zircuit is roughly this link
The ultimate goal of this matter is that every transaction on Zircuit will be a tested transaction result, and there is no need to question whether the transaction is valid again
It is also necessary to mention that the detection of whether the transaction is malicious is based on an AI model trained by the project team itself, and the training data is other EVM-compatible chains on the market
This design is also equivalent to a built-in intelligent automatic audit. With the support of these components, a more secure Rollup ecological foundation is built
Today can be said to be a huge shock in the Chinese crypto community. The DEXX platform for on-chain dogfighting has problems, and a large number of user funds have been transferred away. At present, I see that the amount on the chain is nearly 500 million. It is too large and this money cannot be moved in the short term. #DEXX被盗
Web3 rights protection is really difficult. I have been rugged several times in these years. None of the rights protections have any results. Finally, I am numb to it when I encounter it again
I hope everyone can have a good follow-up this time🙏🏻
Neopin was originally a relatively active Defi protocol on the Klaytn chain. It specifically entered the RWA track. If RWA wants to be successful, it still relies on offline resources. Neopin has made some progress in regional cooperation.
In addition, Klaytn has upgraded its brand this year and merged a new L1 infrastructure. I am quite looking forward to its new development. It may indeed be the largest blockchain ecosystem in Asia.
The trend of Neopin itself is a bit lame. The classic opening is the peak. There is nothing to say.
About rating🔻 S: Must pay attention to, but in principle it is difficult to have projects with this rating A: Worth being included in the observation pool B: Generally, it is the level of relatively active projects and has the opportunity to enter the observation pool C: A relatively ordinary target D: Not worth paying attention to
Note: The content of this series will not involve any business components
$ENA has a not-so-good signal, and the trend of the high point is further decreasing.
Specifically reflected in this relay pattern, as can be clearly seen in the figure, from the upper white line to the upper yellow line
And the lower edge of the relay is also probed, the direction and point of this relay are unclear, try to expand the cycle and draw a larger trend line, and do a good job of retracement control