Written by: Haotian
After reviewing the optimization points of the ELIZA V1 and V2 frameworks, I felt a significant improvement, especially in the unified management of Agent wallets, unified message management, and enhanced scalability capabilities. However, to be honest, the current stage of the ELIZA framework is still at the optimization level of the basic development architecture and has not significantly expanded the 'imagination space'. Personally, I am looking forward to its future possibilities for 'commercialization' and 'chainability':
1) A complete Agent interoperability protocol, including the basic message protocol for Agents (format standardization, routing mechanism, state synchronization, etc.), Agent dialogue interaction protocol (multi-Agent dialogue management, context information storage and state synchronization, etc.), Agent resource sharing mechanism (allocation of computing, storage, etc.), Agent task allocation mechanism (intent understanding, task decomposition, progress synchronization, aggregation rules, etc.), and Agent identity and permission management layer (identity authentication, scoring system, permission management mechanism, etc.);
2) A Tokenomics protocol, including governance token definitions (ai16z or ELIZA?), incentives for Agent participants (incentives for Agent developers, data contribution incentives, rewards for computing resource provision, verification node rewards, etc.), Gas economic system (Agent calling fees, Memory storage resource fees, cross-chain operation fees, deflation burning rules, fee distribution mechanism, etc.);
In addition to these two core 'chainable' essential components, how to design a standard for Agent asset circulation management similar to the ERC20 standard, incorporate a decentralized storage system, decentralized verification mechanisms (memory systems, behavior systems), decentralized resource allocation and incentive mechanisms, etc., are all issues that ELIZA needs to consider for long-term 'chainable' reform.
Even if the goal of the ELIZA framework is not to be chainable, how to modularly integrate it into the consensus layer of various chains, participate in governance and verification, and collaborate in other aspects is also worth exploring.
Perhaps only when a 'chainable' roadmap is clearly defined can EliZA firmly establish itself as the leading player at the EVM level in the AI Agent era. But opportunities and variables also lie in this process.
What will ai16z iterate step by step? Can a new framework like Arc catch up? Which framework will be the first to have a clear roadmap for chainable advanced development? Who will be the first to find a feasible commercial closed-loop path like Virtual? These are all directions to watch. Friends interested in the subsequent evolution of AI Agent framework standards can communicate more.