#市场回调抄底还是观望？
Will quantum computing threaten the security of Bitcoin? Satoshi Nakamoto predicted it long ago!
Recently, Google unveiled their quantum computing chip, Willow, which operates at a speed a thousand billion times faster than the most advanced supercomputers today. This news has caused quite a stir in the Bitcoin community, as Bitcoin relies on solving problems for mining.
Even cryptocurrency developers are starting to feel uneasy. Sirer, the head of Ava Labs, is worried that Satoshi Nakamoto's 1 million Bitcoins might not be safe anymore, as Bitcoin's technology seems somewhat outdated in the face of advancements in quantum computing.
Someone dug up a post by Satoshi Nakamoto from 2010 on BitcoinTalk, where he offered a suggestion on what to do if Bitcoin's encryption were compromised. Satoshi said, "If SHA-256 is really broken, we need to first agree on which blockchain is the correct one, lock it down, and then continue using a new hash function."
He also mentioned that if the hash algorithm doesn't collapse all at once but instead gradually starts to fail, then Bitcoin can smoothly transition to a new hash.
"The software needs to be set so that at a certain block number, it starts using the new hash. By that time, everyone will need to upgrade. The software can also store the new hashes of old blocks so that others can't deceive people using the old hashes."
Bitcoin mining relies on the SHA-256 hash algorithm to ensure data integrity, generating encrypted hash values during the mining process. The ECDSA algorithm is used to protect private keys and verify transactions.
Although Willow represents a significant step in quantum technology, its 105 qubits are still far from being able to crack Bitcoin.
The test of a bull market is not just about price fluctuations, but also about our mindset. In the face of account changes, we must remain rational. Next, I will announce the next potential tenfold coin in the community! Guessing is not as good as seizing the opportunity! Like + comment, and share freely.
