The COVID pandemic caused significant economic disruption, leading to halted supply chains, job losses, and stagflation. Some climate change advocates saw this as a positive, as emissions dropped by 5.4%. They proposed “climate shutdowns” – planned disruptions of global economic activity to slow climate change.
However, this idea was rejected by the public and media. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has called for global climate action, proposing that curbs on economic activity and emissions must be implemented to achieve a temperature rise of less than 1.5°C. The IMF suggests that a carbon tax could achieve a similar effect to interest rate hikes, potentially leading to devastating consequences for Western countries.
Global organizations claim that all countries must achieve net zero carbon emissions by 2030 to avoid a “climate gap” – a theory suggesting a 1.5°C temperature increase could trigger environmental disasters and further emissions. However, there is no evidence supporting the theory, and the connection between carbon dioxide emissions and global warming remains controversial.
Critics argue that the true purpose of carbon taxes and climate regulations might be to redistribute wealth from developed countries to developing nations and centralize control over national wealth and individual freedoms, with the IMF potentially benefiting from this control.
Source
<p>The post Climate Shutdowns: The Dark Side of the Globalist Agenda first appeared on CoinBuzzFeed.</p>