Orange Zuo presents three very important axioms today, and everyone is welcome to critique them:
1. Your position is your understanding.
2. Understanding is only divided into right and wrong, not high or low; each person's choice is a manifestation of their understanding.
3. Understanding and position may not match in the present, but will eventually balance out.
This is somewhat similar to the cosmic sociology of logic, very abstract and without data, but over the years I have concluded that this is the principle, and everyone is welcome to discuss and debate.
Let me add a point here; the understanding mentioned in the first point does not refer to your understanding of the world, but rather your understanding of cryptocurrency. I won't elaborate further; you can interpret it as you wish.
Here, I want to specifically discuss the second point, as it serves as a crucial link.
Many people often say understanding is high or low. In the past, Orange Zuo thought so too and considered himself to have relatively high understanding.
But this is actually the exploitation and bullying of so-called high understanding groups towards so-called low understanding groups. This way, they can more easily plunder from the so-called low understanding groups with a high understanding posture.
Everything in the world is dynamically developing, not static, and understanding is the same.
This is the first point, and another key point is that this statement ignores human subjectivity:
In fact, every choice a person can make is the optimal solution based on their current understanding.
So don't laugh at someone opening a hundred times contract as a gambler, because in his world of understanding, this is the fastest way he can think of to turn things around. He doesn't not know that hoarding coins can make money; he just finds it slow.
Can you say that a sweet potato seller doesn't know how to make money in finance? It's just that he currently lacks the strength and energy to do so. If he had the same capital as you, he might not play worse than you.
Here, Orange Zuo wants to extend a statement: understanding has no high or low, but the world is divided into large and small.
It's not that his understanding is low; the understanding of a wealthy playboy is not necessarily higher than that of a learned scholar, but most learned scholars haven't lived as well as wealthy playboys.
So many things are not fundamentally a matter of understanding, but rather a matter of resources.
You can also understand that resources and understanding are positively correlated.
Your world can be very large, large enough for someone to help you strategize, someone to help you solve problems, someone to take care of your daily needs, and someone to help you advance smoothly.
But many people have a very small world, so small that they can only do everything by themselves, so small that they are exhausted yet can barely fill their stomachs, so small that they have to endure illness to save money, so small that every day they can only think about how to earn an extra 100 yuan.
His understanding is not necessarily lower than anyone else's; he is just trapped in a small world.
Let me emphasize again: understanding is only divided into right and wrong, not high or low.
At this point, you can look at the third point Orange Zuo mentioned:
3. Understanding and position may not match in the present, but will eventually balance out.
In the past, Orange Zuo was trapped in a small county where there was little change for over a decade.
Now, although I haven't reached financial freedom, at least I have no worries about food and clothing. To say something unambitious, the current days are something I wouldn't have dared to imagine in the past.
After experiencing so many things, I believe that my current understanding and wealth are matched, and my account balance and understanding are also balanced.
It's hard to say what the future holds. Perhaps I will lose everything due to misunderstandings, but I will try my best to avoid going down that path.
Similarly, Orange Zuo has seen many people fall from the mountain top.
They possessed immense wealth, but in the end, their wealth vanished into thin air, even falling from the divine to the mortal.
Among them, some can make a comeback, while others are doomed to fail.
The relationship between understanding and position is always dynamic; one thought can lead to enlightenment, another can lead to madness.
Today, Orange Zuo boldly proposes three axioms, which are also a very important part of my subsequent theory.
In terms of understanding cryptocurrency, I have my own theoretical system, and I have reached where I am today relying on this theoretical system and code of conduct.
If there is an opportunity in the future, I would like to write it into a book, but I'm afraid I won't have the patience. Let's take it as it comes.
The content is relatively abstract and tests logical ability. If you don't understand something, you can read it multiple times. If you still don't understand, you can leave a message in the comments, and I will reply to all of them.
I'm going out to sign a contract, bye.
I am Orange Zuo, a man focused on recovering cryptocurrency assets who can help you get rich.
Two years ago, we created a web3 terminology dictionary for paying students, named the Red Book, which included hundreds of definitions and applications of professional terms. Now I am giving it to you for free.
Follow me to receive a free electronic version of the Coin Circle Red Book.
