$ACT $PNUT
It's quite interesting.
When ACT was at its lowest point, some people said that ACT had no hope. One of the evidences was that even the volume-injecting robots were gone. There was really no dealer, and it was a truly decentralized community.
When ACT was listed on BN/OK, people were very jealous again, questioning why the exchange didn't list the "community coin" they participated in.
Why didn't they list it? Don't they know clearly? If your "community coin" is backed by a dealer with a large amount of control, will the exchange list it to serve him and ship it?
The exchange's coin listing group is not stupid. Why can ACT and Pnut be listed, and can they continue to rise after listing?
Why did some of the "community coins" that were listed before continue to fall after listing?
A large number of controlled funds quickly pulled up to hundreds of millions or even 1 billion, which is indeed very fomo, but once listed on the exchange, it has been linked to dealers dumping goods. How can it rise?
CEX has thought about this problem clearly a long time ago.
There is nothing wrong with the choice of act and pnut, which is very wise.
Standing at the forefront, new track and new narrative, the coins of the real community: act/pnut can be listed on the big exchanges so quickly.
Becoming the logic of the secondary track and the choice of secondary funds, the upper limit can reach tens of billions of US dollars.
Playing with the strong coins on the chain is no problem, and it can also pull hundreds of millions or even billions, but that is the logic on the chain, not the secondary logic, and it is difficult to be listed on the big exchanges.