Attention! Attention!
The real point of the "black swan" in this round of bull market may be here!
————It may be related to the conspiracy behind the first person in the currency circle, Fried Cat!
↓↓
Yesterday's big drop, 6 US dollars liquidation,
Is it really what Lao Bao said that there will be no interest rate cuts, or missiles launched in the Middle East?
Interest rate cuts!
Hasn't it been cut twice in a short period of time? And the CPI data the day before yesterday has also shown that there will be no interest rate cuts!
As for the missiles launched in the Middle East, it is even more ridiculous
Few people know about it, and the news came out the next day.
And before that, many giant whales have continued to ship out!
So let's review what happened before the main force shipped out?
Multiple historical relics, the wallets that have been lost should be activated one after another!
Among them is Fried Cat, who was once the first person in the currency circle.
We all know that this kid is probably gone, so who activated his wallet?
Is it a conspirator?
Other wallets that have been activated and lost, are the owners of these wallets back, and someone is playing another big game!
You have to know.
According to statistics: about 3.7 million bitcoins are lost, accounting for nearly 19% of the total 21 million to be mined.
If all these bitcoins come back and flood into the market. Don't talk about the bull market, you will see a huge black swan.
But what if these lost bitcoins enter the strategic reserves of the United States? ?
Think carefully, which country is the strongest in the field of quantum.
The United States is also the United States currently leading in quantum computers!
According to news from the dark web, quantum computers can already crack wallet keys. This may be the most reasonable explanation for the reappearance of these wallets after they are lost.
Another point is that Trump wants to use Tebit as a strategic reserve for the United States, so is it worth buying it? The current US economy is simply not able to make such a large expenditure.
Then, cracking the wallet can solve the problem, and the impact of the United States not buying on the market will only be temporary.
What do you think about this?
