A note for those who don’t understand my article:
1. First of all, I am a translator, a translator who describes the meaning conversion of digital messages.
2. The method described in my article is based on the integrated translation of information from all people on the market and all traders. And take out a description of the current main influencers.
Here's an example using Mario Kart:
1. First assume that the long and short parties in the market are A and B.
2. Suppose you are on a runway, but this runway has no end. Currently, A is the first place, B is the second place, and continues to move forward.
3. Let me describe what will happen in the future starting from my article. I will describe the party that gave the information.
For example, A, who is in first place, eats smoke. When I see that A intends to use smoke to interfere with B, I will post a message saying what time A will use smoke.
However, when I don't say anything, it means A takes no action and keeps moving forward. However, my articles are usually treated as if they have not been mentioned yet. This isn't the Tortoise and the Hare, this is Mario Kart.
For example, B in second place has missiles, and I will describe the points at which B is more likely to attack, but A in front casts smoke to block the line of sight, so B cannot see A and cannot lock on, causing B to be unable to attack.
However, when A has the second smoke in his hand, I will say that he will observe B, because she cannot see B when looking in the rearview mirror and is blocked by the smoke. Therefore, although A can cast at a certain point, B does not follow. Just watch and proceed normally. However, people who read my article thought that not releasing smoke meant stopping. This isn't the Tortoise and the Hare, this is Mario Kart.
At this time, on B's side, although he knows that B can attack, he can tell the time. However, B is affected by A's smoke and needs to pass through the smoke before it can re-judge whether to lock on and attack A. Therefore, the article will say that B will wait until what time to come again, which means waiting to pass through the smoke.
Another situation is that before B has passed through the smoke, although the missile cannot be locked, B also has a magnet and the distance is too far. Therefore, the chance of a magnet locking hit is only 30%. This 30% is like the "event owner". However, saying 30% does not mean that it means three times out of ten. This only means that side A moves randomly, and B's lock target accounts for 30% of the entire lock screen. This does not mean that he will definitely hit three times out of ten times, or even not once. Professional masters will even hit ten times out of ten times.
Conclusion: There is nothing so-called accurate or inaccurate in the description of my article, but mostly I just said one side that produced information. This does not mean that both parties will not move on if there is no message.
Many people believe that it is completely unrealistic to use the time and pattern of A's historical smoke release to infer when A will release smoke next time. Wouldn't B take a shortcut and surpass A without attacking A?
Many people always look for KOLs and institutions on Twitter to get the so-called inside information. This means that they see C before the smoke, and also see C releasing missiles, and then judge that C has locked A. In fact, it was simply placed casually or pressed incorrectly.
The tip is not for choosing whether to believe it or not, but you can find out that someone is said to have the tip, but you can have the brains to judge whether the tip is being used anywhere. And you can try to determine whether there is smoke first.
My article just describes each main influencer role and whether it has a message to send out what item it will cast at what time. The article never says who will reach the finish line first, A or B. Because this game has no end.