Odaily Planet Daily News: One of the largest holders of UNI tokens has questioned Uniswap's decentralization and behind-the-scenes dealings, especially its rhetoric of a series of transformations on the grounds of "efficiency" and possible undisclosed financial interests between Uniswap Labs and another blockchain, Optimism. Billy Gao, head of governance at Stanford Blockchain Club at Stanford University (a representative entrusted by thousands of individuals to hold UNI governance tokens), published a 22-post complaint about Uniswap's sudden decision to launch its own blockchain, cancel the proposed fee switching mechanism that could benefit UNI holders, and bypass the DAO that ostensibly governs Uniswap. Gao also expressed doubts about the possible financially motivated behind-the-scenes dealings behind Uniswap's "illegal behavior" of bypassing the DAO. Although he did not make formal accusations, he pointed out that "there must be reasons behind the adoption of the OP (Optimism) stack to support Unichain." Gao asked Uniswap Labs why it chose OP and why everyone should believe that there was no behind-the-scenes deal in this decision. (protos)