Hamster Kombat is Scam #moonbix #HMSTR #HAMSTER $HMSTR # | Rabbi Hassain on Binance Square

Trending Articles

Bookmarked and Liked

--

Hamster Kombat is Scam #moonbix 
#HMSTR #HAMSTER 
$HMSTR
#

Disclaimer: Includes third-party opinions. No financial advice. May include sponsored content. See T&Cs.

639

0

Replies 0

Explore the latest crypto news

⚡️ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto

💬 Interact with your favorite creators

👍 Enjoy content that interests you

Email / Phone number

Relevant Creator

@M1NX

Explore More From Creator

--

$SOL The debate surrounding Ripple, XRP Ledger (XRPL) and the possibility of XRP’s inclusion in a U.S. crypto reserve shows no signs of slowing down. The conversation, already charged with competing ideologies, took another turn when accusations of centralization were raised against Ripple. Some within the crypto community, particularly Bitcoin supporters, remain skeptical of XRP's structure, with prominent voices questioning Ripple’s role and influence. card One of the loudest critics is Pierre Rochard, VP of Research at Riot Platforms, a major Bitcoin mining firm. He has argued that Ripple could theoretically fork the XRPL software, alter escrow locks, or even introduce trillions moreXRP into the supply. For him, the control Ripple allegedly holds undermines any claims of decentralization and creates vulnerabilities in the ecosystem. Schwartz explains David Schwartz, Ripple’s chief technology officer, took the opportunity to push back. His explanation of how XRPL works painted a very different picture — one where decentralization isn’t just theoretical but a functional reality. Schwartz outlined that XRPL relies on a consensus algorithm, not proof of work, to ensure agreement on transactions. Unlike Bitcoin mining, XRPL validators are not compensated, reducing incentives to behave dishonestly or control the system. For about the 400th time, for anyone who doesn't understand what validators do:XRPL actually has a consensus algorithm that actually reaches an agreed consensus. About every five seconds, every node participates in a process to decide how to resolve the double spend problem for… — David "JoelKatz" Schwartz (@JoelKatz) January 26, 2025 Ripple’s CTO also addressed fears about forks and supply manipulation. While anyone can propose changes to XRPL, Schwartz argued, the system’s decentralized structure prevents unilateral action. Validators must reach agreement to adopt any changes, making it highly unlikely thatRipple, or anyone else, could enforce drastic modifications. card The conversation did not stop there.

--

#SOLETFsOnTheHorizon The debate surrounding Ripple, XRP Ledger (XRPL) and the possibility of XRP’s inclusion in a U.S. crypto reserve shows no signs of slowing down. The conversation, already charged with competing ideologies, took another turn when accusations of centralization were raised against Ripple. Some within the crypto community, particularly Bitcoin supporters, remain skeptical of XRP's structure, with prominent voices questioning Ripple’s role and influence. card One of the loudest critics is Pierre Rochard, VP of Research at Riot Platforms, a major Bitcoin mining firm. He has argued that Ripple could theoretically fork the XRPL software, alter escrow locks, or even introduce trillions moreXRP into the supply. For him, the control Ripple allegedly holds undermines any claims of decentralization and creates vulnerabilities in the ecosystem. Schwartz explains David Schwartz, Ripple’s chief technology officer, took the opportunity to push back. His explanation of how XRPL works painted a very different picture — one where decentralization isn’t just theoretical but a functional reality. Schwartz outlined that XRPL relies on a consensus algorithm, not proof of work, to ensure agreement on transactions. Unlike Bitcoin mining, XRPL validators are not compensated, reducing incentives to behave dishonestly or control the system. For about the 400th time, for anyone who doesn't understand what validators do:XRPL actually has a consensus algorithm that actually reaches an agreed consensus. About every five seconds, every node participates in a process to decide how to resolve the double spend problem for… — David "JoelKatz" Schwartz (@JoelKatz) January 26, 2025 Ripple’s CTO also addressed fears about forks and supply manipulation. While anyone can propose changes to XRPL, Schwartz argued, the system’s decentralized structure prevents unilateral action. Validators must reach agreement to adopt any changes, making it highly unlikely thatRipple, or anyone else, could enforce drastic modifications. card

--

PAWS is the new top dog! 🐾 Every step tells a story — let PAWS drop the truth! 🐾 Join PAWS now! https://t.me/PAWSOG_bot/PAWS?startapp=okLjhQqZ LFG! Yo, Legends! 🐾 We’re lookin’ to level up our Telegram channel, and we need your help to make it pop

--

--

Latest News

FORM Experiences Significant 24-Hour Decline

--

Bitcoin's Stability Amid Market Volatility Raises Interest as Safe Haven Asset

--

U.S. Tariffs to Be Implemented Without Delay, Says Commerce Secretary

--

U.S. Commerce Secretary Advocates Tariffs on Penguin Island

--

ETH/BTC Exchange Rate Declines to March 2020 Levels

--

Cookie Preferences

Cookie Preferences