š”
@MantaNetwork and
@Arbitrum Foundation serve different purposes within the blockchain ecosystem. Hereās a comparison of the two:
šÆ
@MantaNetwork and
@Arbitrum Foundation aims to address existing issues such as scalability and security. Even though the end goal they want to achieve is similar, their approaches are completely different.
ā¢ Manta Network is a modular blockchain ecosystem that focuses on zero-knowledge (ZK) applications and improving user privacy and scalability:Ā
ā¢ Arbitrum offer faster and cheaper transactions to solve Ethereumās scaling problem.
šÆ
#Arbitrum is currently the L2 Giant but if we talk about the opportunity difference
#MantaNetwork has more opportunity. The
$MANTA price would be at $10 when it reach the same marketcap of
$ARB .
ā¢Arbitrum Rank: #35
ā¢MantaNetwork Rank: #163
ā¢Rank difference: (366%) higher than Manta.
ā¢Arbitrum MC: $3.75B
ā¢MantaNetwork MC: $442.46M
ā¢Marketcap difference (748%) higher than Manta.
šÆ You cant beat scarcity that's why the higher the supply, the lower the _______??
ā¢Arbitrum: 10B
ā¢MantaNetwork: 1B
ā¢Supply difference: (900%) higher than Manta.
šÆ Regarding the Community and Adoption Arbitrum has gained significant traction within the Ethereum community, with numerous dApps already leveraging its
#Layer2 solutions while
@MantaNetwork is Still building its community, with a focus on privacy advocates and developers interested in confidential transactions. The arbitrum chain leads the industry and got supported by ethereum talented builders and passionate community while MantaPacific is growing faster and gaining significant attention for the past years.
ā¢Arbitrum TVL: $13.71B
ā¢MantaNetwork TVL: $770M
ā¢TVL Difference: (1680%) higher than Manta.
šÆ Revenue and Cost Trends Over the Year:
@MantaNetwork may have a lower revenue compared to other L2 Giants, but it remains competitive in terms of a lower cost ratio. It is the ONLY L2 that has maintained a cost lower than 20% from it's revenue.
ā¢ Arbitrum: 62%
ā¢ MantaNetwork: 18%
ā¢ Revenue and Cost difference: (44%) higher than Manta.
šÆTotal Gas fees Saved:
ā¢Arbitrum- $3.32M
ā¢MantaNetwork - $13.95M
ā¢Gas Saved difference: 420% higher than Arbitrum.
šÆActive wallet address:
ā¢Arbitrum: 1.44M
ā¢MantaNetwork: 1.76M
ā¢Active wallet difference: (22%) higher than Arbitrum.
šÆThe YoY growth rate active address of TOP L2's.
ā¢Arbitrum: 94%
ā¢MantaNetwork: 1174%
ā¢YoY difference: (1080%) higher than Arbitrum.
šÆ Total Transaction:
ā¢Arbitrum: 1.37B
ā¢MantaNetwork: $76M
ā¢Transaction difference: (1703%) higher than Manta.
šÆ Average Transaction Fee in the last 24H.
ā¢ Arbitrum: $0.004
ā¢ MantaNetwork: $0.000
ā¢ Transaction Fee Difference: (300%) higher than Manta.
CONCLUSION: The data gathered here are from top Layer 2 platforms that provide transparent and verifiable insights into their growth potential. Please note that this information does not constitute financial advice. While both platforms boast unique competitive advantages, their primary focus is addressing Ethereum's scalability issues rather than competing with each other. Notably,
#ARB and Manta Network still have ample for growth and development. underscoring their promising prospects in enhancing Ethereum's ecosystem.
#MANTA #ARB