The collapse of Facebook's ambitious cryptocurrency project, Libra, marked a significant chapter in the company's history and the broader crypto industry. Initially envisioned as a global digital currency capable of disrupting traditional finance, Libra was meant to revolutionize the way people transferred money, particularly in developing nations. However, the project has faced numerous setbacks and challenges, ultimately failing to meet its lofty goals. Drawing insights from former Facebook executives, it's clear that Libra’s demise was due to a complex web of regulatory, technical, and strategic missteps.
The Bold Vision of Libra
When Libra was first announced in 2019, the ambition behind it was nothing short of groundbreaking. The idea was to create a global, decentralized digital currency backed by a basket of stable assets like the US dollar, euro, and others. The hope was that Libra would provide a stable, inexpensive means of conducting cross-border transactions, especially for people without access to traditional banking services.
The project was initially spearheaded by Facebook’s Calibra (now Novi) team and was backed by a coalition of tech giants, financial institutions, and nonprofits. At its core, Libra was meant to bridge the gap between the underbanked and the financial system, using Facebook’s massive user base to ensure widespread adoption.
Regulatory Challenges: A Key Factor in Libra’s Demise
One of the primary factors behind the collapse of Libra was the intense regulatory scrutiny it faced. Governments and financial regulators around the world were quick to voice concerns over the project’s potential to disrupt national currencies, facilitate money laundering, and undermine financial stability. Despite Facebook’s assurances that it would maintain a responsible approach, the project was viewed with skepticism by regulators, particularly in the U.S. and Europe.
In testimony before U.S. lawmakers, Facebook executives—including David Marcus, who led the Libra project—struggled to convince regulators that the project would operate within the confines of existing financial regulations. The global nature of the currency also raised concerns about its potential to circumvent local laws and tax systems. It became increasingly clear that Libra’s promise of decentralization would not mesh with the regulatory frameworks governing traditional currencies.
Internal Struggles and Corporate Resistance
The regulatory challenges weren’t the only hurdles Libra faced. Internally, the project struggled to maintain unity among its many stakeholders. While Facebook (now Meta) had the infrastructure and user base to make Libra a reality, the company’s reputation and its history of data privacy issues made it a difficult partner for many corporations and governments. Major financial institutions, like PayPal, Mastercard, and Visa, initially joined the Libra Association but later withdrew, citing concerns over regulatory pressures and the project's long-term viability.
There was also significant internal resistance within Facebook itself. Former employees and insiders have suggested that Facebook’s attempts to control the project’s development and vision may have alienated key partners and contributors. The company’s top-down approach, coupled with its reputation for mishandling privacy and security issues, left many questioning whether Libra could operate independently and ethically without being swayed by Facebook’s corporate interests.
Rebranding and Retooling: Novi and Diem
In an attempt to salvage the project, Facebook rebranded Libra to Diem in 2020. Along with the rebranding came a shift in strategy: the idea of a global currency was scaled back, and Diem was repositioned as a digital stablecoin designed for specific use cases, such as facilitating payments on Facebook’s own platforms like WhatsApp and Instagram. The retooling of the project reflected Facebook’s realization that creating a global cryptocurrency might be too ambitious in the face of mounting regulatory and corporate challenges.
Despite these changes, Diem faced continued difficulties in gaining regulatory approval, and its ultimate fate was sealed when Meta announced it would sell off its Diem assets in 2022. The once-promising project had lost the support of many key players and was left to flounder without clear direction.
The Lessons from Libra’s Demise
Libra’s failure offers several key lessons for both the crypto industry and tech companies looking to innovate in the financial space. First, it underscores the importance of navigating regulatory hurdles early on. Facebook’s inability to effectively address concerns from regulators around the world was a significant setback for the project.
Second, the Libra debacle highlights the complexity of managing partnerships across diverse stakeholders. The dissolution of the Libra Association, following withdrawals from major companies, demonstrates how difficult it can be to maintain consensus when so many powerful actors are involved.
Finally, Libra’s downfall reinforces the notion that trust is a crucial component in any financial service. Facebook, with its reputation for mishandling user data, faced an uphill battle convincing users and regulators that it could manage a global currency responsibly.
Conclusion: A Cautionary Tale for Future Crypto Projects
The story of Libra’s rise and fall offers a cautionary tale for anyone looking to launch ambitious projects in the ever-evolving cryptocurrency space. While Libra’s vision was revolutionary, the failure to align with regulatory expectations, address internal dissent, and maintain partnerships ultimately led to its downfall. For future projects seeking to disrupt traditional finance, the lesson is clear: careful planning, transparency, and a deep understanding of regulatory landscapes are essential for success in an increasingly scrutinized industry.
#Libra #AIAndGameFiBoom #EthereumAwakening?

Ben Laidler, global markets strategist at the trading and investment platform eToro, analyzes the behavior of the main currencies, with the dollar “the best performer of the G10 this year, as markets react to greater strength in US growth and stronger inflation.” “The pound sterling has a lot in common with the dollar and has remained on par, while the yen has taken a detour and has been the big laggard,” he points out.

The dollar is well valued as macroeconomic differences widen