The Airdrop Illusion: Why Free Money Isn't Worth the Hype
I recently checked out the HMSTR airdrop and was met with disappointment. The amount was paltry, and the position was locked, rendering it virtually worthless. This wasn't an isolated incident; the CATI airdrop suffered a similar fate.
The root cause? An overwhelming user base.
In the past, public chains and projects had mere hundreds of thousands of users, with big airdrops catering to tens of thousands. Fast-forward to the TON chain, where tens of millions of users clamor for free money.
The math doesn't add up.
With Blum's soaring popularity, users have created dozens, hundreds, or even thousands of accounts. The inevitable outcome? Airdrop spoils will be meager, leading to another round of complaints.
Moonbix, under Binance's umbrella, is unlikely to issue coins. Rewards will likely be tokens or peripherals from other projects.
The harsh reality:
Don't expect substantial gains with a single account.
To play the game, consider creating multiple accounts (hundreds, perhaps?). Explore TON projects, and keep an eye out for innovative products.
Airdrops have become:
- Overhyped
- Oversubscribed
- Undervalued
Adjust your expectations and strategy accordingly.
Alternative concise version:
TON Airdrops: Not Worth the Frenzy
User base too large; rewards too small.
Blum's popularity fuels multi-account creation.
Moonbix rewards unlikely to be substantial.
Explore TON projects, create multiple accounts (if you must), and temper your expectations.
