On August 6, Nassim Taleb joined CNBC’s “Squawk Box” to share his insights on Bitcoin, market trends, and speculative assets. The conversation provided a deep dive into Taleb’s critical views on Bitcoin and the nature of speculative markets.

Nassim Taleb, born on 12 September 1960 in Lebanon, is a distinguished scholar, author, and former trader known for his expertise in probability, risk, and uncertainty. He is widely recognized for his influential books, including “The Black Swan,” which examines the impact of rare, unpredictable events. Taleb serves as a distinguished scientific advisor to Universa Investments, a hedge fund founded by Mark Spitznagel that focuses on strategies to protect against extreme market events. His role involves providing insights based on his research in risk management, aligning with the fund’s approach to capitalizing on rare, high-impact occurrences.

Bitcoin: Not a Hedge Against Financial Meltdown

Taleb began the discussion by addressing Bitcoin directly. He was unequivocal in his assessment that Bitcoin is not a hedge against financial instability or money printing. Instead, Taleb classified Bitcoin as a speculative asset comparable to high-priced real estate in Manhattan, which he noted also tends to track the stock market. According to Taleb, Bitcoin’s value fluctuations undermine its utility in an economic system that seeks price stability. He said that the massive price swings from $10 to $60,000 make it unreliable as a currency or store of value.

The Nature of Speculative Assets

Continuing the discussion, Taleb highlighted the broader concept of speculative assets. He pointed out the unpredictable and ephemeral nature of Bitcoin’s worth, likening it to other speculative investments. Taleb emphasized that the value of Bitcoin, like certain stocks or real estate, is driven more by speculation and the “greater fool theory” than by intrinsic value. He argued that it is not useful to have assets with such extreme price volatility when the goal is economic stability.

Bitcoin vs. Gold

A significant portion of the discussion compared Bitcoin to gold. Taleb drew sharp contrasts between the two, noting that while gold has intrinsic properties that have maintained its value over millennia, Bitcoin lacks these characteristics. He believes that gold’s value is rooted in its physical properties, immutability, and cultural significance, while Bitcoin depends entirely on a network of servers and continuous maintenance, making it inherently unstable and speculative.

Taleb said that during the recent market meltdown, gold’s price managed to stay relatively stable, demonstrating its value as a safe haven asset.

The Debate on Bitcoin’s Future

The interview grew more animated as one of the show’s co-hosts, Joe Kernen, challenged Taleb’s views on Bitcoin. Kernen suggested that Bitcoin’s adoption by some investors indicates its potential as a valuable asset. However, Taleb remained steadfast in his criticism, arguing that Bitcoin’s speculative nature makes it unsuitable for long-term investment or as a currency. Kernen urged Taleb to put his money where his mouth is and either buy Bitcoin or short it.

Featured Image via Pixabay