LIVEAnti-Dom
@ICP_Top3
ICP最大的问题是Dfinity在大裁缝个人不透明独裁治理下的中心化投票权，严重割裂了社区利益。把研发成本完全通过通货膨胀倾销到ICP持币人身上。
Following
Followers
Liked
Shared
See original
PINNED
I don't have much education. Can anyone tell me other public chain communities, such as Bitcoin or Ethereum, where their founders can control up to 20% of the voting rights? ICP has hidden and designed an extremely centralized and very un-blockchain control mode, and cannot accept the constraints of community hard forks at all (because of software licensing and Big Tailor's potential voting rights, ICP is impossible to hard fork)
This is why the market and investors don't buy ICP, and why more and more 8-year party members FUD it. The 8-year party has become the hidden slaves of Big Tailor. #ICP
$ICP $BTC $ETH
This is why the market and investors don't buy ICP, and why more and more 8-year party members FUD it. The 8-year party has become the hidden slaves of Big Tailor. #ICP
$ICP $BTC $ETH
LIVEAnti-Dom
--
Some inside information about the Great Tailor and the Foundation
Why doesn’t the market buy ICP? Because the founder of ICP, the Tailor, has hidden his personal ambition and desire for extreme centralization of power through complex institutional design, and therefore put his personal technical preferences above the entire market and investment institutions, ignoring the interests of the community and selling coins with inflation, which violates the most fundamental decentralized spirit of blockchain.
After in-depth digging, we uncovered a lot of unknown information about the foundation and the tailor:
Before ICP went online, Big Tailor worked in California and Silicon Valley for a long time. Since ICP went online in 2021, Big Tailor quickly fled back to Europe and never dared to set foot in the United States again. Why? Because he was entangled in lawsuits in the United States, and there were 3-5 civil lawsuits ongoing, including lawsuits filed by early ETH investors, and his divorced ex-wife and son sued Big Tailor for not paying after selling coins. Big Tailor was suspected of defrauding early investors and family members at the beginning of ICP financing, and the cases are currently pending.
After in-depth digging, we uncovered a lot of unknown information about the foundation and the tailor:
Before ICP went online, Big Tailor worked in California and Silicon Valley for a long time. Since ICP went online in 2021, Big Tailor quickly fled back to Europe and never dared to set foot in the United States again. Why? Because he was entangled in lawsuits in the United States, and there were 3-5 civil lawsuits ongoing, including lawsuits filed by early ETH investors, and his divorced ex-wife and son sued Big Tailor for not paying after selling coins. Big Tailor was suspected of defrauding early investors and family members at the beginning of ICP financing, and the cases are currently pending.
See original
PINNED
Some inside information about the Great Tailor and the Foundation
Why doesn’t the market buy ICP? Because the founder of ICP, the Tailor, has hidden his personal ambition and desire for extreme centralization of power through complex institutional design, and therefore put his personal technical preferences above the entire market and investment institutions, ignoring the interests of the community and selling coins with inflation, which violates the most fundamental decentralized spirit of blockchain.
After in-depth digging, we uncovered a lot of unknown information about the foundation and the tailor:
Before ICP went online, Big Tailor worked in California and Silicon Valley for a long time. Since ICP went online in 2021, Big Tailor quickly fled back to Europe and never dared to set foot in the United States again. Why? Because he was entangled in lawsuits in the United States, and there were 3-5 civil lawsuits ongoing, including lawsuits filed by early ETH investors, and his divorced ex-wife and son sued Big Tailor for not paying after selling coins. Big Tailor was suspected of defrauding early investors and family members at the beginning of ICP financing, and the cases are currently pending.
After in-depth digging, we uncovered a lot of unknown information about the foundation and the tailor:
Before ICP went online, Big Tailor worked in California and Silicon Valley for a long time. Since ICP went online in 2021, Big Tailor quickly fled back to Europe and never dared to set foot in the United States again. Why? Because he was entangled in lawsuits in the United States, and there were 3-5 civil lawsuits ongoing, including lawsuits filed by early ETH investors, and his divorced ex-wife and son sued Big Tailor for not paying after selling coins. Big Tailor was suspected of defrauding early investors and family members at the beginning of ICP financing, and the cases are currently pending.
See original
$ICP From 2022-05-15 to 2023-12-15, a total of 19 months, the price of $ICP was in a long box oscillation range.
From 2023-12-16, the ICP price broke through the upper edge of the box 9.5U and began to rise, oscillating all the way until 2024-06-16 and fell back into the box again, a total of 6 months.
So do you know how many ICPs were lost in DFINITY's neurons in these 6 months? 98.54M-86.14≈12.4M. Can anyone explain where these ICPs went? ?
Even if you don't count the private wallets of the big tailor @Dominic_w
and team members, DFINITY has sold so many ICPs. Now you know why the price of ICP has been rising in the first half of this year, but it always feels like it's being pressed down by a mountain.
Unless you want to tell me that DFINITY took the ICP out of the neuron and then did nothing with it except put it in the wallet for appreciation. $BTC $ETH
Notorious garbage leader
From 2023-12-16, the ICP price broke through the upper edge of the box 9.5U and began to rise, oscillating all the way until 2024-06-16 and fell back into the box again, a total of 6 months.
So do you know how many ICPs were lost in DFINITY's neurons in these 6 months? 98.54M-86.14≈12.4M. Can anyone explain where these ICPs went? ?
Even if you don't count the private wallets of the big tailor @Dominic_w
and team members, DFINITY has sold so many ICPs. Now you know why the price of ICP has been rising in the first half of this year, but it always feels like it's being pressed down by a mountain.
Unless you want to tell me that DFINITY took the ICP out of the neuron and then did nothing with it except put it in the wallet for appreciation. $BTC $ETH
Notorious garbage leader
See original
Be content. The Ethereum Foundation only holds 0.25% of the total, and only sells off once a year under deflation. Do you know how much #ICP has sold? 😂 The foundation holds 20% of the total voting rights and its market value is almost 1% of Ethereum. The annual selling accounts for at least half of the Ethereum Foundation's expenses of $ICP . The founder also thinks this is natural, and the price is not important. What is important is to criticize other public chains, Amazon and Google, Mesa Blockchain Research, and coin holders for being stupid and impatient, and also criticize his ex-wife for daring to sue him and ruin his reputation. 😂 In comparison, Vitalik Buterin is much more reliable in just dating.
LIVE
AICoin官方
--
Ethereum Foundation’s spending transparency questioned: ETH held is only enough for 8 years of expenses
Author: Ignas, Crypto KOL
Compiled by: Felix, PANews
On August 24, the Ethereum Foundation deposited 35,000 ETH (about 94.07 million US dollars) into Kraken. The last time ETH was transferred to Kraken was on May 6 last year, when 15,000 ETH (about 30.1 million US dollars) was transferred to Kraken. ETH fell by 13% in the following 6 days.
The transfer operation has aroused concerns in the crypto community. In response, Aya Miyaguchi, executive director of the Ethereum Foundation, claimed: "This is part of the Ethereum Foundation's fund management activities. The Ethereum Foundation has an annual budget of about $100 million, which is mainly composed of grants and salaries. Some recipients can only accept legal currency. For a long time this year, the Ethereum Foundation was told not to conduct any fund activities because the supervision is complicated and plans cannot be shared in advance. However, this ETH transfer transaction does not mean a sale, and there may be a planned and gradual sale in the future."
Compiled by: Felix, PANews
On August 24, the Ethereum Foundation deposited 35,000 ETH (about 94.07 million US dollars) into Kraken. The last time ETH was transferred to Kraken was on May 6 last year, when 15,000 ETH (about 30.1 million US dollars) was transferred to Kraken. ETH fell by 13% in the following 6 days.
The transfer operation has aroused concerns in the crypto community. In response, Aya Miyaguchi, executive director of the Ethereum Foundation, claimed: "This is part of the Ethereum Foundation's fund management activities. The Ethereum Foundation has an annual budget of about $100 million, which is mainly composed of grants and salaries. Some recipients can only accept legal currency. For a long time this year, the Ethereum Foundation was told not to conduct any fund activities because the supervision is complicated and plans cannot be shared in advance. However, this ETH transfer transaction does not mean a sale, and there may be a planned and gradual sale in the future."
