Orange Zuo presents three very important axioms today, and everyone is welcome to critique them:

1. Your position is your understanding.
2. Understanding is only divided into right and wrong, not high or low; each person's choice is a manifestation of their understanding.
3. Understanding and position may not match in the present, but will eventually balance out.
This is somewhat similar to the cosmic sociology of logic, very abstract and without data, but over the years I have concluded that this is the principle, and everyone is welcome to discuss and debate.
Let me add a point here; the understanding mentioned in the first point does not refer to your understanding of the world, but rather your understanding of cryptocurrency. I won't elaborate further; you can interpret it as you wish.

Alright, alright, now the situation has become interesting.

Today, the Shanghai High Court published an article, clearly stating: It is not illegal for individuals to hold virtual currency.

Although in the public sphere, everyone thinks holding currency is fine, but the official statement has been awaited for many years.

For so many years, the official attitude has always been unsupportive, uncertain, and pessimistic.
The official attitude mentioned by Orange Seat, the entire official stance, including all lines and departments, everyone has a unified voice: If it’s not allowed, it’s not allowed; if it is allowed, it’s still not allowed.

But over time, various departments found that this is not right. If you deny the property attribute of digital currency, many tasks cannot be carried out. You can't just say 'violating public order and good customs' in any situation and refuse support.

As expected, the previous article was deleted quickly, and I don’t know what triggered the risk control.
I don’t know whether other people’s jobs were destroyed or not, but my article was destroyed.

Regarding the assets of the heco chain, you can go to htx’s customer service yourself and follow his instructions step by step. I won’t say more here.

Today I want to share with you a story I heard in Chongqing. It is very interesting and also serves as a warning.

There is a group of people in China who specialize in offline U-collecting business.
They are wealthy, money is no problem and the price is negotiable.

As you all know, Juzuo’s main business at present is asset recovery.

But the scope of asset recovery is actually very broad. You can understand it as all assets that are out of your control need to be recovered.
Depending on the different business scenarios, the target audience may be large or small.

For example, the liquidation and recovery of exchanges have always accounted for a high proportion of the cases handled by Juzuo, because exchanges are a rigid demand, and there are still many assets deposited in exchanges that have not been withdrawn today.
The liquidation of Huobi is an event that cannot be ignored in the history of cryptocurrency, because almost everyone in the cryptocurrency circle had downloaded Huobi at that time.

Yesterday, quite a few people in the cryptocurrency circle became unlucky, and the assets in their dexx accounts were looted.
So much so that today, even though Sol was so happy, he was still ridiculed:
Because I want to continue to buy local dogs, I have to continue to buy sol.

Well, today I will tell you a story about an unlucky guy to make you feel a little better.
10 million people stuck in a parallel universe
This is the most tragic unlucky person that Ju Zuo has encountered recently - his assets can be seen, but he just can't touch them.
A few nights ago, someone found me and said that his sui was transferred to the wrong apt chain and asked me if I could get it back.

What did last night’s article say?
Serious people, who the hell spends money to buy coins?

Ten hours in total? Dexx is doing this for you.
So far, more than 100 million US dollars worth of coins have been lost, but they were not bought with money.
Didn’t yesterday’s article make another prediction? Let’s review it again:

Then when I woke up this morning, a bunch of losers were crying and shouting that they wanted to kill the boss of dexx.

What the hell, they are not in the country anymore.

In fact, someone had already contacted Juzuo about this project in September this year. From the perspective of product positioning, it is actually quite good.

Today's title comes from Jiang Wen's movie (Evil Never Dies), and the original clip goes like this:

Comparing this to the cryptocurrency world, Juzuo restored the following paragraph:
Who would spend money to buy coins?
Do you spend money to buy coins?
If I don’t buy it, will you spend money to buy the coins?
If I don’t buy it, who can really spend money to buy the coins?
Can the coins bought with money still be called coins?

Chinese chives!

Although I made up this passage, it is by no means groundless.
Because whether it is Satoshi Nakamoto or Vitalik Buterin, their coins were definitely not purchased with money.

Think about it again, what are the roles of the two parties who can say this in today's cryptocurrency circle?

The recent market conditions are so good, everyone must have made a lot of money.
I guess everyone is very depressed because the speed at which they spend money every day cannot keep up with the speed at which they earn money.

There have been a lot of stories about people getting rich quickly recently, with some making tens of millions or even hundreds of millions. It seems like a lot of people have made a lot of money online.

But after seeing Master Pang’s post today, Ju Zuo also did a test and found that there are actually not as many people making money as imagined.

In fact, there are even fewer people who make money by playing memes.

Of course, it may also be that our group of people are not very good at it, so we all gathered together and failed to make any money.