Generally speaking, questioning the issue of listing coins i | 艾叔是个好哥哥 on Binance Square

See original

艾叔是个好哥哥

--・12.4k views

Generally speaking, questioning the issue of listing coins is contradictory in itself.
[The bull market itself is a place where projects are launched in large numbers, and at the end of the bull market, there is even more chaos, especially on small platforms]
1. Builders, participants, and those who make money from airdrops, all want to be listed on Binance. Listing on Binance is the ultimate goal of many projects.
2. For BNB periodic holders, there are currently three channels to get the opportunity to get airdrops for listing coins: launchpool, megadrop, Holder, and airdrop. Let alone the coin price, do periodic holders lose money? There are 1 point of new airdrops every month, and there are 20 in a year.
3. Because Binance has stronger liquidity, more players, and more attention, there are more voices of doubt. The small exchanges of friendly competitors have new coins almost every day, and even many Pixiu coins, and there are many projects that are sold in packages. [Is there any stricter project security review than Binance? ]
4. The idea of ​​listing contracts first and then spot.
In the early days, listing on Binance was the ultimate goal of the copycat, so listing on Binance was often the highest point. Binance started to list contracts first to absorb the selling pressure, and then gradually evaluated and launched spot products. Refer to the early blur, etc.

LIVE

Yi He

--

Recently, some friends have been discussing what coins should and should not be listed on Binance. I will try to explain: The cryptocurrency world is a free market. The liquidity and trading volume of CEX and CEX, CEX and DEX, and various trading platforms are a total pool. CEX is not a closed market. Even if Binance does not list these projects, these projects still exist. Trading volume and funds will also be diverted to the corners of the entire industry. In addition to the unlocking of VC-invested projects, Meme coins, chain-based local dogs, wool-pulling, and capital plates will all be diverted. After the ETF is approved, the traditional financial market will also divert funds that flow directly to the cryptocurrency world. Let's look at VC again. Some VCs are indeed the core reason for the inflated prices, but VCs generally raise funds from LPs for a 7-year lock-up period of 4+3 years, collecting management fees + dividends; VCs are generally unlocked one year after TGE (not all), so many VCs in the cryptocurrency circle are also going bankrupt, and some VCs' LP investments in the cryptocurrency circle may also return to zero; and project parties that have received large amounts of financing have more possibilities to cross the bubble cycle, but the fundamentals of the currency price and governance model are determined by the project party, and there is no standard answer. Therefore, before investing, everyone needs to do a more in-depth analysis of the project tokens, such as token application scenarios, release cycles, holding ratios, and initial circulation. There is no standard answer.
The rise of Defi has brought more liquidity to the industry and increased freedom, which has increased the difficulty for CEX to try to formulate rules, but this is precisely the charm of the free market in the cryptocurrency circle. DYOR

Disclaimer: Includes thrid-party opinions. No financial advice. May include sponsored content. See T&Cs.

Replies 23