The rapid development of blockchain technology is reshaping our lives and business models. As a promotion and incentive mechanism in the blockchain ecosystem, Airdrop has received great attention in recent years. However, airdrops often come with various challenges and risks, the most notable of which is Sybil Attack. This article will explore the significance and current situation of airdrops, analyze cases such as LayerZero and ZKSync, understand how they deal with challenges, and explore the development direction of airdrop mechanisms in the future.

Why does the project party conduct airdrops?

There are multiple reasons why blockchain projects choose to conduct airdrops, which establish the core position of airdrops in the blockchain ecosystem:

  1. Increase visibility and user engagement: Through airdrops, projects can quickly attract a large number of users, expand the community size, and enhance the project's market influence.

  2. Disperse token holdings: Through airdrops, project owners can distribute tokens to more users, avoiding excessive concentration of tokens in the hands of a few large users, thereby increasing the degree of decentralization of the project.

  3. Test networks and applications: Through airdrops, project owners can encourage users to test, thereby discovering and fixing potential problems and improving product quality and user experience.

  4. Incentivize early supporters: Through airdrops, project owners can reward early supporters and increase user loyalty and engagement.

Challenges of airdrops

As the airdrop mechanism becomes more popular, project owners are also facing more and more challenges and potential risks:

  • Sybil Attack: The attacker abuses the airdrop rewards by creating a large number of fake identities, causing the rewards originally intended to be distributed to real users to be divided up by a large number of fake accounts.

  • Bots: Automated tools and scripts (bots) may be used to manipulate votes and obtain airdrops, thereby undermining fairness.

  • Abuse of supervision mechanisms: Malicious users may exploit loopholes in airdrops to attack or manipulate, harming the healthy development of the project.

LayerZero's Witch Sweep

In terms of dealing with airdrop challenges, LayerZero's Sybil Cleanup has become a high-profile case. They have taken a series of measures to combat Sybil attacks and protect the fairness of airdrops.

On May 4, 2024, LayerZero Labs launched the "Self-Report Sybil Activity" program. If the Sybil address self-reports the relevant address on the designated page, it can get 15% of the expected distribution without answering any questions. The deadline is May 17 at 19:59:59.

After the self-reporting period ends, the sweep operation is divided into two phases. In Phase 1, the official will release a list of all identified Witch users, and those users who have been identified but have not self-reported will not be able to receive airdrop allocations; in Phase 2, the official will open the bounty, and users can submit detailed reports of Witch activities. Successful reports will result in Witch users being denied airdrop allocations and bounty hunters will receive 10% of the expected allocation amount for Witch addresses.

Through these measures, LayerZero successfully marked and screened a large number of potential Sybil addresses, improving the fairness of the airdrop.

Until June 4, 2024, Bryan Pellegrino tweeted that the witch report was being reviewed and users could submit objections. Although being included in the report list will increase the risk of the relevant address being considered a witch, it does not mean that the address will definitely be judged as a witch. The final witch list has not yet been released, and the current report may be a false positive, which will be screened in the end. The final version of the witch address list will be announced before the end of June.

Then on June 8, 2024, Bryan Pellegrino tweeted again that Nansen had confirmed 60,995 addresses as witch address clusters:

And some screenshots of other studio witch addresses:

The highly anticipated ZKSync airdrop plan

Following LayerZero, ZKSync, a Layer 2 solution based on zero-knowledge proof (ZK-Rollup) scaling technology, has also attracted great attention recently, especially its newly launched airdrop plan. The ZKSync Association will conduct a one-time airdrop of 3.6 billion ZK tokens to early users and adopters next week, and there are 695,232 eligible wallets. The snapshot time is March 24, 2024. Community members can check the airdrop eligibility at https://claim.zknation.io/ and claim the airdrop from next week until January 3, 2025.

This airdrop represents 17.5% of the total supply of ZK tokens. Users will be able to claim their tokens starting on June 24, 2024, and the claim period will last until January 3, 2025.

Users eligible for the ZKSync airdrop

The qualifications and criteria for the ZKSync airdrop distribution are very strict to ensure that only genuine users and contributors are rewarded:

  1. Users (89%): Active ZKSync users who transact on ZKSync and meet the activity threshold.

  2. Contributors (11%): Individuals, developers, researchers, communities, and companies that contribute to the ZKSync ecosystem and protocol through development, advocacy, or education.

Eligibility is based on a snapshot of ZKSync Era and ZKSync Lite activity as of 00:00 UTC on March 24, 2024.

How the ZKSync airdrop is distributed

ZKSync distributes airdrops based on users’ trading activity and holdings on ZKSync Era and ZKSync Lite:

  1. Eligibility: Each address applying for the airdrop must have at least one credit to indicate its activity on ZKSync.

  2. Distribution calculation: The airdrop distribution is calculated based on the user's assets in ZKSync Era (including assets in wallets and DeFi) and the holding time of these assets. The upper limit of airdrop for a single address is 100,000 ZK.

  3. Multiplier Rewards: Users can also obtain allocation multipliers by holding ZKSync native NFTs, participating in DeFi projects, and other activities to reflect their contributions to the ZKSync ecosystem.

Witch Detection

This airdrop places special emphasis on Sybil detection to ensure that rewards go to real users. ZKSync uses on-chain data analysis and behavioral pattern recognition to eliminate Sybil addresses, thereby ensuring the fairness and effectiveness of the distribution.

Interestingly, it did not launch a large-scale witch hunt, but it was widely criticized for this. Among the 690,000 addresses that received airdrops, not only were the airdrop details vague, but there were also multiple witch addresses that had been checked. According to witch hunter Artemis, some insider traders obtained more than 2 million ZK tokens by depositing the same Ethereum funds on the same day, and almost all accounts were marked on LayerZero's witch list.

The future of airdrops

The long-standing tacit understanding of the airdrop rules between the wool party and the project party seems to have caused misunderstandings between the two. Many users believe that airdrops are the "labor income" they deserve. In the bear market, users work hard and actively, contribute to the handling fees to provide income, and help the project create the illusion of prosperity on the chain, so they should be "rewarded". However, these users are more purposeful, and the project party may not fully buy in.

The project's original intention was not to confront the community, but after thousands of studios joined the army of money-making, they needed to be more cautious about the airdrop distribution.

LayerZero and ZKSync’s airdrop plans demonstrate innovative governance measures taken by blockchain projects when facing challenges such as Sybil attacks. These cases provide valuable experience for future airdrop designs.

In the current cryptocurrency ecosystem, various airdrop plans still face huge challenges and opportunities. We hope that more blockchain projects can learn from these successful experiences and design a more fair, transparent and secure airdrop mechanism to contribute to the healthy development of the entire ecosystem. Both project teams and ordinary users should maintain a cautious and innovative attitude in this wave of new technological changes and jointly embrace the infinite possibilities in this sea of ​​stars.