Odaily Planet Daily News The Uniswap Foundation has previously postponed a key vote that will determine whether to upgrade the governance structure and fee mechanism of the protocol to better reward holders of UNI governance tokens. Although the Uniswap Foundation said the decision was "unexpected" and apologized for it, this is not the first time it has postponed a vote on whether to implement "fee conversion." This is also not the only time that token holders have a conflict of interest with other "stakeholders" in Uniswap. Crypto legal expert Gabriel Shapiro believes that this is another example of DeFi protocols treating token holders as "second-class" citizens, whose wishes are subordinated to the wishes of a small number of stakeholders. (CoinDesk) Earlier news, the Uniswap Foundation postponed the UNI staking and delegation rewards vote originally scheduled for last Friday because a stakeholder discussed some issues that needed to be paid attention to with the foundation, which required additional due diligence for a comprehensive review. Due to the immutability and sensitivity of the proposal upgrade, it was decided to postpone the vote. Paradigm researcher Dan Robinson wrote on the X platform: “It is disappointing that a large VC tried to manipulate the token governance process at the last minute and postpone community proposals to advance their own ‘pet’ project.” Dan Robinson did not specify which VC it ​​was.